RE: [SAtalk] SA 2.61 and DYNABLOCK/SORBS

2003-12-20 Thread Peter SJF Bance
ell, the reason for the SORBS match is *only* because of the DYNABLOCK match (for some reason this results in two hits)... -- Peter SJF Bance CEng MBCS CESG and BCS Listed Security Adviser http://www.minstrel.org.uk/ --- This SF.net email

RE: [SAtalk] bigevil 2.04 posted

2003-12-20 Thread Peter SJF Bance
> hmm. i love www.sorbs.net dns BL. he says we can help by > running a server > to help catch more rubbish and report it. > > out of interest, does anybody do that here? You don't need to run your own server to do that - try www.spamcop.net -- Peter SJF Bance CEng MBCS

[SAtalk] SA 2.61 and DYNABLOCK/SORBS

2003-12-19 Thread Peter SJF Bance
uot;us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.6 tag1=3.0 tag2=6.3 kill=6.3 tests=AWL, RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,