[SAtalk] Re: Whitelist not working?

2003-11-03 Thread Patrick Beard
> SA 2.60 > Postfix 2.0.16 > > I've got various local daemons that occasionally send email from > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Works like a charm. Unfortu- > nately, SA flags them as spam: > So, I added whitelist entries to /etc/spamassassin/local.cf for all > the machines in my home

[SAtalk] Re: Re: All pdf attachments are defanged

2003-10-29 Thread Patrick Beard
>> Emails with a total attachment of less than 200k come through fine. Emails >> greater than 200k are corrupted. >Are you sure it's 200k and not 250k? >Look at spamc(1), option -s Yep, that was it. NT4 was reporting the file size at 200K, but setting a byte value with the -s solved it. Thanks

[SAtalk] Re: Re: All pdf attachments are defanged

2003-10-28 Thread Patrick Beard
(Sorry Patrick - I think you'll get this twice) > How are you passing mail to SpamAssassin? > I'm using Exim 3.36 as a relay in our DMZ, so I configured Exim with the following transport and router; TRANSPORT: spamcheck: driver = pipe command = spamc | exim -oMr spam-scanned -f '<$sender_addres

[SAtalk] Re: All pdf attachments are defanged

2003-10-28 Thread Patrick Beard
>with a DOC. The 'doc' email comes through with the header tags and a > 'doc' > attachment. The PDF email comes through with no SA tags header and the pdf > is > now inline ASCII. Neither of these two emails were tagged as spam (which is > correct). > I have tried setting report_safe to zero but no

[SAtalk] All pdf attachments are defanged

2003-10-28 Thread Patrick Beard
Hi I'm using Spamassassin on a Dabian stable system. The version of SA is a backport from Debian Sid (SA 2.60-2). Everything is working fine except inbound PDFs attachments appear to be defanged when this happens there is also no SA tags in the header even though it is being handled by the SA-Exim