Re: [SAtalk] 50% Spam Reduction Rate

2003-10-06 Thread Nigel Wilkinson
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:09:08 -0400 "David M. Carney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've only had spamassassin installed and operating for about 2 days. > > I don't normally get a lot of spam, but it only seems to be stopping > about half of all the spams that hit my mailbox. > > My ~/.procmailrc f

Re: [SAtalk] Does the * in the X-Spam-Level header upset procmail

2003-10-01 Thread Nigel Wilkinson
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:26:22 -0400 (EDT) Satya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 1, 2003 at 00:03, Nigel Wilkinson wrote: > > >I want to filter useing the number of asterixes in the X-Spam-Level > >header but I think this is a wildcard in procmail. Does anyone kn

[SAtalk] Does the * in the X-Spam-Level header upset procmail

2003-09-30 Thread Nigel Wilkinson
Hi I want to filter useing the number of asterixes in the X-Spam-Level header but I think this is a wildcard in procmail. Does anyone know if this will upset procmail. Cheers Nigel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to g

Re: [SAtalk] Postfix and spamc - call by shell or Procmail

2003-09-17 Thread Nigel Wilkinson
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:02:11 -0400 Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have been trying to understand the advantages and disadvantages of > using the shell script method (like that employed by SecuritySage) and > the Procmail method as a content_filter for Postfix. Can someone lend > a

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

2003-09-12 Thread Nigel Wilkinson
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:09:02 -0400 (EDT) "Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok. Let be be more clearerer. > > What I'm looking for is a set of recipes for rejecting the Sobig:F > virus based on the text that appears in the Subject line. Are you quite happy to accept all other viruses

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

2003-09-12 Thread Nigel Wilkinson
Spamassassin is a spam blocker not a virus checker. You want a virus checker such as antivir, see http/www.antivir.de. This is free for personal use. Nigel On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:11:10 -0400 (EDT) "Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that I can just add? > > TIA > > -- > -Time flies

Re: [SAtalk] How to create a public folder on imap server for use with sa-learn

2003-09-09 Thread Nigel Wilkinson
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 11:00:36 -0400 Scott Blomquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Scott I'll give it a try Cheers Nigel > > > Nigel Wilkinson wrote: > > > Hi folks > > > > the spammassassin FAQ suggests creating public folders on an imap > &g

[SAtalk] How to create a public folder on imap server for use with sa-learn

2003-09-08 Thread Nigel Wilkinson
Hi folks the spammassassin FAQ suggests creating public folders on an imap server for moving missed spam and false spam into so that the bayesian stuff can learn. Could someone point me to some documentation or give me a pointer on how to create these please. Cheers Nigel --

Re: [SAtalk] FW: Feedback on how identified spam is being handled

2003-09-07 Thread Nigel Wilkinson
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 15:55:40 -0400 Burt Juda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can pipe it thru 'formail' to nuke the headers that SA added, like > so: > > cat FILE | formail -I'X-Spam-Checker-Version:' -I'X-Spam-Level:" > \ > -I'X-Spam-Status:' -ds sa-learn --[s]ham > > The

Re: [SAtalk] Another Keyword for Spam

2003-09-06 Thread Nigel Wilkinson
Can I throw in my 2 pennies worth. I'm starting to receive the following bastardised words in spam h0t gir1s li.ve C~um Suc`king Free [EMAIL PROTECTED] c.um c0ck and more OK so I've added rules to try and catch them but they keep coming up with new variants. Cheers Nigel On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 15:2