the spam that gets filtered into my spam folder
is learned by the bayes database. Most recently, it seems that spam with
hits of 25.10, 23.20, and 11.80 points were learned, while those with
34.30 and 5.00 points were not. Any ideas on what is going on here?
Thanks,
Mike Mills
?
Thanks,
Mike Mills
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletpr
I'm having trouble running spamassassin to find out why a spam was not
caught. I've tried invoking as follows:
/usr/bin/spamassassin -D spam
or
~/sausr/bin/spamassassin -D spam
where spam is the message exported to a file. In both cases the process
seems to get caught in an infinite loop,
I've just upgraded from SpamAssassin version 2.43 to 2.55. I've been
using sa-learn to build up the Bayesian database. Still, SpamAssassin
doesn't seem to be using the Bayes test. All of the spams it catches fail
due to other rules, and it is letting a good number of other spam get
through.
