Re: [SAtalk] Another new spammer ploy?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich Puhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We also may want to consider the effect on our existing rules. Perhaps > we'll need a preprocessor to s/<\!--.*-->//g so that spammers can't > simply do something like: > > free porn and low rate mortgages It would be a good i

Re: [SAtalk] Deersoft acquisition

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Rose, Bobby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For example: if the open-source > project comes up with or adds some new algorithm of detection does that > automatically become NAI property which ends up in their commercial > product (like bayes in 2.50)!? Note that the

Re: [SAtalk] date -R an anachronism?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > Note that 'date -R' is documentd as outputing rfc-822 compliant > formats and not rfc-2822 compliant formats. It could just be > obsolete. (No I did not look at the old standard. I think date is > using locales incorrectly h

Re: [SAtalk] Penalty score for a mail account?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Körber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can use the Delivered-To: header for that purpose. Anyhow, I haven't > found a documentation about how to add custom scores to the user > config file. Can anybody give me a hint? header VERY_OLD_ADDRESS Delivered

[SAtalk] Re: Consistency between releases

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kenneth Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm curious about something -- can you actually create a recipe in > procmail to filter emails with X-Spam-Status at 20 or more to send emails > directly to /dev/null? > > If so, what would the recipe be? I have not tested i

[SAtalk] Re: Catching virus distribution with SpamAssassin (was Re: Misc.rule ideas)

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MIMEdefang does exactly what > you want. It will strip away executable files and discard them > completely for you -- perfect filtering of the "junk" you get. It looks like MIME

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Catching virus distribution with SpamAssassin (wasRe: Misc. rule ideas)

> How would you, for example, propose to catch a polymorphic executable > virus? Our code catches these using a disassembler and examining the code > to see if it tries to do something malicious. I don't really care what the code is trying to do. I would be happy to discard all executables. Eve

[SAtalk] Re: Catching virus distribution with SpamAssassin (was Re: Misc.rule ideas)

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Low-hanging fruit, though it's out of date these days, catch >> the snowhite virus since it's there: >> >> header SNOWWHITE_VIRUS Subject =~ /Snowwhite.*REAL story/ >> describe SNOWWHITE_VIRUS The snow whit

[SAtalk] Re: HUNZA_DIET_BREAD

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What the heck, I changed it to /HUNZA/i Shouldn't this at least be /\bHUNZA\b/i? -- Shields. ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net