Re: [SAtalk] Failed to make libsnp.a

2004-01-31 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Peggy Kam wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to install SpamAssassin 2.63 under SunOS 5.9 by making > libsnp.a; however, I keep encountering the following error: > > gcc -I. -c -o snprintf.o snprintf.c > snprintf.c: In function `__uqtoa': > snprintf.c:183: error: conversion to no

Re: [SAtalk] Installation failure

2004-01-28 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Peggy wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have posted this message earlier, however, for some strange reasons, it was > never posted. Here it is again: > [...] > > snprintf.c:552: error: incompatible types in assignment > > make: *** [snprintf.o] Error 1 > > > > I realized that there are

Re: [SAtalk] suid and spamc

2004-01-26 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Keith Olmstead wrote: [...] > Jan 26 10:20:29 testserver.server.net spamd[623]: debug: bayes: no dbs > present, cannot scan: /.spamassassin/bayes_toks Jan 26 10:20:29 > testserver.server.net spamd[623]: debug: Score set 1 chosen. Jan 26 > 10:20:29 testserver.server.net spamd[6

RE: [SAtalk] stats

2004-01-22 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Vermyndax wrote: > Matthias... > > Argh, that looked abysmally easy. I guess I could have taken a crack at > that after all. may i take this as a sign of success (my english isnt that good in all terms ...) ? :) > You might want to try Bob's 1.5 script though... doesnt wor

RE: [SAtalk] stats

2004-01-22 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Bob Apthorpe wrote: Hi, [...] > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for filter:500. > > Jan 22 09:05:10 sara-too spamd[14936]: identified spam (8.2/5.0) for > > filter:500 in 1.9 seconds, 1756 bytes. > > I fixed the regex[1] in 1.3 and made some other changes; try > > http://www.cynistar.n

RE: [SAtalk] stats

2004-01-22 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Vermyndax wrote: hi, [...] > Jan 22 09:05:08 sara-too spamd[14936]: info: setuid to filter succeeded > Jan 22 09:05:08 sara-too spamd[14936]: processing message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for filter:500. here we have a diff in out log files: > Jan 22 09:05:10 sara-too spamd[1493

RE: [SAtalk] stats

2004-01-22 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Bob Apthorpe wrote: [...] based on sa-stats.pl 1.3 i did a quick fix (yes again...) all u have to do is this: cut all line between # Agh... this is ugly. [...] <<< delete all these lines here #Split line into components and replace it with this one:

RE: [SAtalk] stats

2004-01-22 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Alan Munday wrote: > Matthias > > I tried your spamstats, which appears to work fine. > > The only exception is that it does not show the counts for HAM/SPAM. > hmm, sorry mate. i should have said this earlier, so i do it now. i was able to fix it for sendmail/milterassassin/s

[SAtalk] Re: ALERT - GroupShield ticket number OA4_1074781220_ZETXCH01_3 was generated

2004-01-22 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, GroupShield for Exchange (ZETXCH01) wrote: > Action Taken: > The attachment was quarantined from the message and replaced with a text > file informing the recipient of the action taken. > > To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

Re: [SAtalk] stats

2004-01-22 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Vermyndax wrote: > Greetings all... > > I am trying to implement a way to generate statistics for Spamassassin. > I've tried numerous perl scripts but most of them return all zeros for > the stats. The biggest example I can think of is the sa-stats.pl > script. No matter wha

Re: [SAtalk] [RD]FP Backhair - minor change

2004-01-21 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Jennifer Wheeler wrote: > Added another more obscure tag. Thanks Kelson. Version 1.3 > thanks for all your work ! regards, Matthias --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools

Re: [SAtalk] spamd choking on locks?

2004-01-20 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Dale Harris wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:08:56PM -0800, Dale Harris elucidated: > > > > I would have searched the archive for the but SF seems less than > > helpful. I'm seeing a lot of errors like: > > > > Jan 20 03:44:11 skull spamd[27980]: lock: 27980 unlink of lock

Re: [SAtalk] sa 2.61 & dccifd 1.2.21

2003-12-18 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote: [...] > dccifd[3408]: [ID 528926 mail.error] missing message body > spamd[15366]: DCCifd -> check skipped: Permission \ > denied Died at /opt/gnu/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 638. just did an upgrade to 1.2.

[SAtalk] sa 2.61 & dccifd 1.2.21

2003-12-18 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
Hello, since a couple hours i'm using dccifd instead of dccproc. when i start spamd using -D option all seems fine. dccifd gets found and used by spamd, there are also DCC_CHECK in final scoring summery. so when i start spamd wihtout the -D option (syslog gets a bit too huge ..) i get the followi

Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn and bayes

2003-12-11 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Dan Tappin wrote: [...] > bayes_auto_expire 1 > bayes_learn_to_journal 0 > > My maillog still shows 'permission denied' errors on the /var/root/.spamassassin > folder. When I run sa-learn (as root) my bayes > files are created in /var/root/.spamassassin/ but as user

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin lint errors

2003-12-11 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Aaron Levitt wrote: [...] > check_for_content_type_just_html and check_for_bad_dialup_ips. I > verified that the PerMsgStatus was loaded, but I'm not sure where to go > from here. This is running SA 2.5x. > > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated! did you updating /us

Re: [SAtalk] DCC/Razor/RBLs

2003-11-17 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Josh Endries wrote: [...] > Razor, Pyzor, and DCC are different or separate from using RBLs. If so, > what list(s) does SA check? have a look at: .../share/spamassassin/20_dnsbl_tests.cf > Now for the main course. DCC has a few different ways of running: > milter, daemon, pr

Re: [SAtalk] Pyzor and DCC? Are they working?

2003-11-17 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Geordon VanTassle wrote: > Hello spamassassin-talk, > > I'm moderately new to SA, and completely new to Pyzor and DCC. > I've installed Py and DCC per the instructions (I think. Not getting any > errors, anyway) and I have set SA to add DCC and Pyzor headers, but I'm >

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 - idle spamd childs

2003-11-16 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, David B Funk wrote: [...] > That does not sound right. I'm using sendmail+miltrassassin+spamd > and spamd children always quit when done. In other words, when my > system is not receiving any mail there is just one sendmail daemon > the miltrassassin daemon and the parent spa

[SAtalk] SA 2.60 - idle spamd childs

2003-11-15 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
Hello, on my system i get many idling spamd childs, which wont die by itself. this happens from time to time, if machines load gets higher by other processes. eg. mimedefang kills its idling childs after a while; is this a possible future option for spamd too? i'm using miltrassassin as milter ap

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60-1 installation

2003-11-13 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Gorm Jensen wrote: [...] > Doesn't the perl-Mail-SpamAssassin package contain all of the > dependencies required by spamassassin? > > I wish to add DNS capability, but perl-Net-DNS requires > perl-Digest-HMAC-MD5. I found a package called perl-Digest and > installed it, but i

Re: [SAtalk] Sole scanner?

2003-11-03 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Patrick Morris wrote: [...] > There are more ways to do this than I can count. Do you have an MTA you > particularly like, or are familiar with? It'd be easier to try to > explain how to do it in a way that fits with your systems than to try to > cover all the countless possi

Re: [SAtalk] Standard Spamd Deamon

2003-11-01 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Masoud Pajoh wrote: [...] > command everything works fine. > Is there a standard script that starts Spamd in deamon mode at startup? > Where can I find one? > Thanks for all the help. there is an init script provided with spamassassin: Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60/spamd/redhat-rc-s

Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn error

2003-11-01 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Mike Hyde wrote: > I am running into the following running sa-learn --dump: > > Use of uninitialized value in numeric lt (<) at > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm line > 1281. > 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: bayes db vers

[SAtalk] SA-2.60 DCC

2003-10-15 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
Hi, i've just installed dcc with these configure options: ./configure --disable-server --disable-dccm --with-rundir=/var/tmp \ --homedir=/local/home/milter/dcc switched within dcc_conf: DCCUID=root into DCCUID=milter (this user is running spamd / milterassassin too) first result i saw was this

Re: [SAtalk] Spamstats

2003-10-09 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Mike Carlson wrote: > Anyone have problems getting spamstats to return numbers for the spam counts? Tha > faq on gryzor's website is of little help. [...] > Oct 9 13:17:41 altair spamd[31462]: identified spam (8.7/5.5) for root:1002 in 4.7 > seconds, 3405 bytes. > Oct 9 13

Re: [SAtalk] Is there a way to reject a message before it arrives?

2003-10-09 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Fabiano Bonin wrote: [...] > If there was a way to reject the spam in the mail server (returning the > rejection to the sender), maybe the spammers will remove our addresses > from its lists, and the traffic will decrease. > > Is this step possible? If yes, where can i find mo

Re: [SAtalk] Load configuration file

2003-10-07 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote: > [...] > > I'd like to know the receiver domain (hello.com in the example) and load > > or do something to use the specific setting for "hello.com". > > > > Is it possible? how ? IS there an another way ? &g

Re: [SAtalk] Why SpamAssassin STOP FILTERING SPAM !!! HELP !!!

2003-10-07 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, O-Zone wrote: > Hi all, > here's my problem, AGAIN ! I've checked perms into /usr/share/spamassassin and > are all owned by spamfilter user. This is my startup command: > > /usr/bin/spamd -a -C /etc/mail/spamassassin/ -d -u spamfilter -m 10 > > and this is an header of a SPAM m

Re: [SAtalk] Load configuration file

2003-10-07 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Christian Ista wrote: [...] > I'd like to know the receiver domain (hello.com in the example) and load > or do something to use the specific setting for "hello.com". > > Is it possible? how ? IS there an another way ? if i got u correctly, yes, is possible: whitelist_from [E

Re: [SAtalk] Highest Score

2003-10-06 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Ed Kasky wrote: > Our highest score since Sunday: > spamd[21411]: identified spam (55.0/7.0) > > Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 1242 > Number of spams : 242 ( 19.48%) > Number of clean messages: 1000 ( 80

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 - uninitialized value

2003-10-04 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Sam Kalet wrote: hI, you`re right, mixed that lines, sorry :D [...] > If I change line 707 to read: > > last if (defined $actual_length && $actual_length == $expected_length); i've tried this and got still some errors from it. i've changed the line into: last if (defined $e

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 - uninitialized value

2003-10-04 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote: Hi, its me again, with the same problem, thnx Malte for answering. well, i was able to "fix" the problem, but not at all, as i've seen after playing with it again. i still get those strange error messages, as i told u abou

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin stop filtering SPAM !!!

2003-10-03 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, O-Zone wrote: > Hi all, > here's the header of an e-mail of spam passing througth spamassassin. It seems > do not work. Why ? [...] > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 > X-UIDL: +"S!!m@,!!=LF"!lUk"! well, if spamd is running, have a

[SAtalk] SA 2.60 - uninitialized value

2003-09-28 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
Hallo, I've got lotsa syslog entrys like the following ones: [...] spamd[23223]: Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /opt/gnu/bin/spamd line 707, line 69 spamd[23223]: Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /opt/gnu/bin/spamd line 707, line 70. spamd[23223]: Use of un