Re: [SAtalk] bug in the report reserved words list

2003-11-20 Thread Matt Cramer
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: > Have you considered escaping the underscore? Although it's not required to > escape an underscore in a URI by RFC standards, there's no reason you can't > encode them as %2D. > > Thus: > http://www.example.com/my_file_name.htm > becomes >

[SAtalk] bug in the report reserved words list

2003-11-19 Thread Matt Cramer
It seems that the list of reserved words that map to variables when using the report command, such as _SUMMARY_, doesn't actually limit itself to only the list in the man page. Any string that ends and begins with an "_" will be parsed as a variable. It was driving me nuts trying to figure out why

[SAtalk] bayes countering nigerian spam rules

2003-11-19 Thread Matt Cramer
Bayes has been working great. We use it site-wide here, with corpora of about 20K spams and hams. We used to get anywhere from 4-12 false positive reports per month, requiring whitelisting (we have about 6K email users). Now we get none, and I attribute that to Bayes. Nice job, SpamAss authors,

RE: [SAtalk] why is sa not catching the microsoft emails ?

2003-09-25 Thread Matt Cramer
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, BG Mahesh wrote: > Not sure if the rules we have added in local.cf are wrong. We are using SA+procmail > > header LATEST_NET_SPAM Subject =~/^Latest Net Critical Upgrade/i > describe LATEST_NET_SPAM Bounce - "Spam from Microsoft" > scoreLATEST_NET_SPAM 10.0 > > Even if t