[SAtalk] why is this not caught?

nce I'm only subscribed to the digest version of this list. Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/ Seminar fuer Statistik, ETH-Zentrum LEO C16Leonhardstr. 27 ETH (Federal Inst. Technology) 8092 Zurich S

Re: [SAtalk] Spam profiting from auto_whitelist -- how to avoid?

> "Christopher" == Christopher M Iarocci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Fri, 20 Jun 2003 12:55:26 -0400 writes: >> I've been using Bayes and auto whitelisting for several weeks >> only, but on a site wide basis (i.e. spamc/spamd triggered from >> procmail from sendmail). >>

[SAtalk] Spam profiting from auto_whitelist -- how to avoid?

der.org/referred.html [RBL check: found 74.228.206.65.query.bondedsender.org., type: 127.0.0.10] CLICK_BELOW(0.0 points) Asks you to click below ==> how can I look at my whitelist database and modify it? I have a *.dir and *.pag file Thanks a lot for a

[SAtalk] Bayes learning "sudden death" ..

the problems can happen. You may ask/answer me off list too (I'm on the digest only anyway). Thank you in advance, Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/ Seminar fuer Statistik, ETH-Zentrum LEO C16Leonhardstr. 27 ETH (Federal Inst. Tec

Re: [SAtalk] Frustrating spam

Well, it did score 13.30 without the bayes learner and even 16.30 using the bayes data base, with SpamAssassin (2.53 1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp): --- This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached along