Re: [SAtalk] Problem starting 2.6 with sudo

2003-10-06 Thread Mark Edwards
Scott Griffith, ISES-LLC wrote: On Oct 6, Mark Edwards wrote: I'm having a problem starting spamd via sudo. This is using the current FreeBSD port, and the behavior started with SA 2.6. I can start it successfully if I su to root, but if I try to use sudo, I get: sudo

[SAtalk] Problem starting 2.6 with sudo

2003-10-06 Thread Mark Edwards
I'm having a problem starting spamd via sudo. This is using the current FreeBSD port, and the behavior started with SA 2.6. I can start it successfully if I su to root, but if I try to use sudo, I get: sudo /usr/local/etc/rc.d/spamd.sh start Insecure directory in $ENV{PATH} while running with

[SAtalk] Re: Restart Spamd

2003-09-30 Thread Mark Edwards
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:58:44 -0400 From: Scott Rothgaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Palmetto Network Solutions, Ltd To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: Restart Spamd Malte S. Stretz wrote: > kill -HUP should work with SpamAssassin 2.60 under Perl 5.6.1 and up

Re: [SAtalk] SIGHUP crashing spamd in 2.60

2003-09-29 Thread Mark Edwards
From: "Hannu Liljemark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:18:48 +0300 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SIGHUP crashing spamd in 2.60 On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:21:32PM -0700, Mark Edwards wrote: > Anyone else not able to SIGHUP

[SAtalk] SIGHUP crashing spamd in 2.60

2003-09-27 Thread Mark Edwards
I was excited to see the addition of SIGHUP functionality in 2.60. Unfortunately, while spamd seems to receive and obey the signal: Sep 27 15:15:50 lilbuddy spamd[47851]: server hit by SIGHUP, restarting spamd dies shortly thereafter. I'm running the port on FreeBSD 4.8p10. I do have the razo