If one had the capability to do so, would it not be more efficient to
use the domain list in an RHSBL? Granted that it uses a net lookup, but
if you secondary the zone on a localhost DNS server, I would think that
it would make it a lot easier for people to keep the file updated..
Don't get me
Hi all,
Is there a way to use an RHSBL list with SpamAssassin?
In searching, I've found a lot of info for custom RBL details, but
nothing on RHSBLs (domain based DNS blocklists).
Thanks!
Jeff
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux
Thanks everyone for the comments and suggestions (too many to reply
individually to everyone). I'm working on an update to the guide, which
should be ready / posted in a day or two.
BTW, if anyone is in Chicago October 14-16, I'll be speaking at the
Security Decisions conference (http://securit
Here are the stats from our servers:
The numbers below are averages per day for our primary MX over the past
30 days, with an average of 861,344 emails per day.
mime_header_checks rejects 11% of emails
SecuritySage_rhsbl5 rejects 14% of emails
header_checks rejects 23% of emails
body_checks r
Hi all,
I've just posted a new guide in my series of Postfix Anti-Spam
documents. This one is a step-by-step guide to getting Postfix working
with SpamAssassin as per the configuration that I like using.
Comments and constructive criticism are welcome.
The guide can be found here:
http://www.s
Has anyone come up with a solution to this yet?
Regards,
/Jeff
On Friday, July 4, 2003, at 08:02 PM, Dale LaFountain wrote:
On 05.06.2003 16:48 Uhr, Chris Balay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AARGHH! I am in spam hell!
Well when I run spamassassin from the terminal I get the following
error:
raz
Hello all,
If anyone is interested, there's a new RHSBL available that is based on
the SecuritySage access filters
(http://www.securitysage.com/files/access).
Information about the RHSBL can be found at:
http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce_rhsbl.html
Regards,
___
Jeffrey P
