RE: [SAtalk] backhair hits on an attachment

2004-01-09 Thread Lindsay Snider
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 11:39, Gary Funck wrote: > > > From: Lindsay Snider > > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:03 AM > > > > > > I'm running pbw dated 2003-11-13. Backhair recently hit hard on a piece > > of ham. The rules matched on an uuenco

[SAtalk] backhair hits on an attachment

2004-01-09 Thread Lindsay Snider
IR_22 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_23 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_31 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_32 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_33 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_34 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_42 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_43 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_44 1.00, J_BACKHAIR_51 1.00, OBFUSCATING_COMMENT 4.20, UPPERCASE_50_75 0.00) I have the source uuencoded message if anyone would like to see it. -

Re: [SAtalk] SA and Mailscanner

2003-10-20 Thread Lindsay Snider
On Friday 17 October 2003 14:34, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 01:29 PM 10/17/03 -0400, Jon Fraley wrote: > > >From looking at some posts, it looks like Mailscanner just looks for a > > > >score from SA. Does this mean that the message does not get re-written > >as an attachment with the report if it i