[SAtalk] what is this

procmail: Assigning "SPAM=SPAM" procmail: Assigning "SPAMMERS=/.procmail/spammers" procmail: Assigning "LOGABSTRACT=ALL" procmail: Executing "spamassassin,-P" procmail: Assigning "SPAM=SPAM" procmail: Assigning "SPAMMERS=/.procmail/spammers" procmail: Assigning "LOGABSTRACT=ALL" procmail: Executin

Re: [SAtalk] Suggested new rules and changes

they had a sample rule defined as you defined that one :-) On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:54:36 -0700 "Michael Moncur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i can tell you read the LM magazine > > What's that? I don't get it. > > -- > michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/ >

Re: [SAtalk] blacklist

> > looking at the headers it identified him as blacklist but still was > > not tag as spam with a score of -90 > > Run the message through "spamassassin -R" to take him off the automatic > whitelist? > how did he get on that list? how do i run the message? ___

Re: [SAtalk] testing spam

is [...] needed > $ cat .spamassassin/user_prefs > [...] > header FROM_MAILER_DAEMON From =~ /mailer-daemon|mail delivery > subsystem/i describe FROM_MAILER_DAEMON Probable bounce message > (from a mail system) score FROM_MAILER_DAEMON -2.5 > > ...and, to my pleasant surpris

Re: [SAtalk] Suggested new rules and changes

:-) > > body MAKING_MONEY /making money/i > describe MAKING_MONEY Discusses making money > i can tell you read the LM magazine ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/s

[SAtalk] blacklist

i added to user_pref blacklist_from someone@foo. looking at the headers it identified him as blacklist but still was not tag as spam with a score of -90 does the blacklist automaticly puts him as spam? ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECT

[SAtalk] white list

whitelist in order to use the whitelist from .spamassassin/user_pref must one remove the "#" from the whitelist line? ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] testing spam

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:46:58 -0800 Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 06:40:22PM -0500, Landy Roman wrote: > > Header TEST_FROM From =~ /adomainname/i > > describe TEST_tandom this is a test rr > > score TEST_FOR_SPAM 7.0 > > The

[SAtalk] testing spam

i tried adding this to my .spamassassin/user_pref hoping it would tag mail from a domain as spam but it seem not to be working any hints? Header TEST_FROM From =~ /adomainname/i describe TEST_tandom this is a test rr score TEST_FOR_SPAM 7.0 ___ Spam

Re: [SAtalk] custom

thanks; On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:47:44 -0500 dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:35:50PM -0500, Landy Roman wrote: > | nice article in LM about spamassassin, i hope the spammers don't > | read it > > Doesn't make much difference. The

[SAtalk] custom

nice article in LM about spamassassin, i hope the spammers don't read it i am kind of confused on custom spamassassin if i want to add rules i would have to do them in user_prefs? do they overright the default rules or just add to them? also, are the default rules visible in any file? ___

Re: [SAtalk] New rules?

where do these rules go? On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:16:31 -0800 Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's a couple rules I wrote to help catch stuff that was making it > through. The scores are my own made-up numbers > > body INCREASE_EJACULATION /increase ejaculation/i > describ

[SAtalk] spamassassin

this tool really stops spam :- ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk