On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 21:42, Chris wrote:
> So if I decided to bail on CPAN and stick with RPM's. Does anyone have any
> instructions to:
>
> a) deinstall the CPAN modules currently loaded
> b) create/install the RPM modules needed for SA, sendmail and procmail?
>
> Chris
>
webmin can do that
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 20:54, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> >
> > We run around 50%. And that's by count. With the MS worms flying in we
> > have noticably more spam by volume than real mail.
>
> Our current stats are 57% Spam, 43% ham. And thats not counting viruses,
> which get blocked before spamassass
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 12:13, cyrille wrote:
> landy a écrit:
>
> >File /var/log/mail : from Oct 12 00:05:27 to Oct 12 21:10:54
> >Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 171
> >Number of spams :36 ( 21.05%)
>
i cant believe today i have so fat 21% spam
File /var/log/mail : from Oct 12 00:05:27 to Oct 12 21:10:54
Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 171
Number of spams :36 ( 21.05%)
Number of clean messages: 135 ( 78.95%)
Average me
thanks all for the reply. iguess i learned something today
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PRO
pam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0 tests=NIGERIAN_BODY1,NIGERIAN_BODY2,
NIGERIAN_BODY3,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no version=2.60
this email has a no but it scored 5.0 which is the default
any idea why the status is no?
---
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 15:19, Martin Radford wrote:
> At Wed Sep 24 08:32:18 2003, Steve Simitzis wrote:
i have to say that in over 200 spams i have not seen a false positive
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek hea
more puzzled i empty the directory and it tells me it examine 6 msgs
n ebug: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: already
learnt correctly, not learning twice
debug: Learning Spam
debug: uri tests: Done uriRE
debug: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: already
learnt correctly, not learning twice
Learned from 0 message(s) (6 message
i have 36 emails in a folder called spam
i run sa-lear for that directory and it learns only from a few msgs
here is output of D
can someone shed advice
as to why it ignores most of the emails there which are already tag as
spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ./learn
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug:
> > You can change this in EvalTests.pm, line 2413.
>
> For a lot of people it'd probably be easier to edit local.cf to insert:
>
> rawbody MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE /^TV[qp]QAA[MI]EAA[A8]A/
>
for me local.cf did not work
i'll try evaltests.pm
-
begin quote
Spam detection software, running on the system "pepino.despiertapr.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root for det
>
> Is downloading the tarball and installing it myself fundamentally
> different than just doing the install from CPAN?
>
> thanks,
> mark
read the install file it will tell you how
>
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:42:56PM +0200, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 September 2003 13:21 CET Garret Brady wrote:
> > I'm using spamassassin 2.55 direct from procmail on a PII450
> > running .rh8.0. I notice that mails with dos executables
> > get through, even though I've the line
> >
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:21:40PM +0100, Garret Brady wrote:
> I'm using spamassassin 2.55 direct from procmail on a PII450
> running .rh8.0. I notice that mails with dos executables
> get through, even though I've the line
>
> score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 5.0
ihave same problem and it was fine in
well for me
the rule of MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 5 was working fine in 2.55 now in 2.60 it does not
work and the email gets tag with 2.5 when my settings in user_prefs says it should be
over 5
it appears 2.6 is ignoring my .spamassassin/user_prefs
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 03:48:55PM -0400, Joh
i notied autolearn=ham does that mean if a spam passes as ham it will learn it has
ham, how can i disable this autolearn feature and what does it really mean, i did not
find anything in the doc
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGee
i have 18 email in this folder
why would i get these results?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> sa-learn --spam --dir
evolution/local/Inbox/subfolders/spam/
Learned from 2 message(s) (6 message(s) examined).
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
back in bus. when 2.6 my perl instalation had broken
so i had to reinstall perl
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk
when will it be in cpan
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.ne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> spamassassin
Can't locate IO/Socket/INET.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i586-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i586-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i586-l
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 07:56, Markus Gaugusch wrote:
> On Sep 22, Tom Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Spamstats does that.
> Thanks! That's EXACTLY what I wanted :)
for this to work do you need spamd?
i use procmail/postfix
and when i ran it got this
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/spamstats-0.4b5>
> You also didn't say what version of SA, or anything about your setup (bayes
> enabled? awl enabled? is razor installed?, etc). Including some
> configuration information, at least a version, is helpful when asking this
> kind of question.
quite honest i am running a default installation of
do you recommend a virus scanner for linux
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 22:31, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 12:34 PM 9/20/03 -0500, Philip Mak wrote:
> >Can SpamAssassin do something about these messages? There's been a big
> >flood of them recently, and they're all slipping through the filter.
>
> Well th
is there a way to see the list of test triggered during an entire day
on incoming email
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassi
how does this sum 4.0, and the best way to make it score 5.0
Subject: Buy Low, Sell High "CMKK" Headed for $3 - Profit Now!
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=5.0
tests=FREE_TRIAL,NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_IN_SBL,STOCK_PICK,SUBJ_BUY
version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
--
any idea why this pass thru SA
From:
MS Security
Services
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Commercial Partner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
New Microsoft
Critical Update
Date:
Sun, 21 Sep 2003
18:13:41 -0400
Microsoft
All Products | Support |
Se
its amazing the amount of spam thas has pass thru saturday
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAI
I SEND AN EMAIL and it bounce b/c i used a blacklist expression
just veryfying my email did not get blacklisted
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
i ran the follwoing command several times withing seconds, why did it
learn from different messages every time?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> sa-learn --spam --dir
evolution/local/Inbox/subfolders/spam/
Learned from 2 messages.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> sa-learn --spam --dir
evolution/local/Inbox/subfolde
i have been getting many of these
and even after doing sa-learn the score is super low,
these emails are really pissing me of
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Change password.
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 21:35:21
what does this really mean, that sa-learn did not learn anything?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> sa-learn --spam
~/evolution/local/Inbox/subfolders/spam/
please specify target type with --dir, --file, or --mbox:
/home/illustre/evolution/local/Inbox/subfolders/spam/
Learned from 0 messages.
--
is the site down?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:htt
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 19:31, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
> ARGH
> I want to SHOOT this spammer. Repeatedly. These ALWAYS pop in at 4.9,
> always using "jnichols@(faked.com)" too. Grrr
4.7 seems to catch those and still no effect on good mails
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 08:54, Amnon wrote:
> Here it comes again. For those of you who may have a better idea, what rule
> would you use to catch this "pic.gif".
>
that pic.gif is pissing me off
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
> You can create the configuration directory with automatically generated user
> ID / password by using 'razor-admin -create' under the same user ID that you
> also use for 'spamassassin -r'.
thanks
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
i am not seeing messages i've posted to the list today, and reading at
the archieves i saw the respnse you posted for me simon...
is there a delay on the list
i also saw from my procmail that SA marked as spam a msg from SA labeld
"I've got a couple more I want to go after" but i did not see it
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 03:34, mikea wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 07:30:23PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
me to i think someone has stolen the emails from SA list and used us as
fish baits. i am pist...
for last 3 days got tons of emails as if i send spam or virus to people
--
i have noticed big delays between sending to the list and recieving it?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtu
is there a way to have SA report avg scores of all incoming emails and
and avg socre of those detected as spam?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOT
ok i got this email from my dummy account and i got it on my regular
account replying to see if it makes it
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 20:09, butrus orman wrote:
> NONE of these emails are arriving at my account at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> can someone shed some light
>
> --- Chris Thielen <[EMAIL
someone seems ot have fake my email address to send and i got this in
return?
From:
Mail Delivery
Subsystem
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Returned mail: see
transcript for
details
Date:
Tue, 19 Aug 2003
15:34:06 -0500
(CDT)
The
i tried this but i get this error
please help
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> spamassassin -r < Mail/virustrack
razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Razor2 report requires authentication
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Reporter.pm line 99.
Warning, unable to report spam
how would i use -r to report a message as spam, do i need to save it to a file?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novel
sorry if i was not clear before but someone put my address as from and
send out a spam
what can i do to aovid being tagged as a spammer
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from DJH4R401 ([63.237.164.221]) by mx4.centurytel.net
(8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7JKXujM080317 for <[EMAIL PR
where do i report ips that send spam
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com.
Did you know that Dice has over 25,000 tech jobs available today? From
careers in IT to Engineering to Tech Sales, Dice has tech jobs from the
best hiring compa
lately some spam is penetratingwith a 3.5 score, other then reducing
the score how could i be able to have SA tag this mail as spam
i.e the from address had this : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and these were the results
below the tests are the test theemail failed? if so how could i make no
real_name >
procmail: Assigning "SPAM=SPAM"
procmail: Assigning "SPAMMERS=/.procmail/spammers"
procmail: Assigning "LOGABSTRACT=ALL"
procmail: Executing "spamassassin,-P"
procmail: Assigning "SPAM=SPAM"
procmail: Assigning "SPAMMERS=/.procmail/spammers"
procmail: Assigning "LOGABSTRACT=ALL"
procmail: Executin
they had a sample rule defined as you defined that one :-)
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:54:36 -0700
"Michael Moncur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i can tell you read the LM magazine
>
> What's that? I don't get it.
>
> --
> michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/
>
> > looking at the headers it identified him as blacklist but still was
> > not tag as spam with a score of -90
>
> Run the message through "spamassassin -R" to take him off the automatic
> whitelist?
>
how did he get on that list? how do i run the message?
___
is [...] needed
> $ cat .spamassassin/user_prefs
> [...]
> header FROM_MAILER_DAEMON From =~ /mailer-daemon|mail delivery
> subsystem/i describe FROM_MAILER_DAEMON Probable bounce message
> (from a mail system) score FROM_MAILER_DAEMON -2.5
>
> ...and, to my pleasant surpris
:-)
>
> body MAKING_MONEY /making money/i
> describe MAKING_MONEY Discusses making money
>
i can tell you read the LM magazine
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/s
i added to user_pref blacklist_from someone@foo.
looking at the headers it identified him as blacklist but still was not
tag as spam with a score of -90
does the blacklist automaticly puts him as spam?
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECT
whitelist
in order to use the whitelist from .spamassassin/user_pref
must one remove the "#" from the whitelist line?
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:46:58 -0800
Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 06:40:22PM -0500, Landy Roman wrote:
> > Header TEST_FROM From =~ /adomainname/i
> > describe TEST_tandom this is a test rr
> > score TEST_FOR_SPAM 7.0
>
> The
i tried adding this to my .spamassassin/user_pref hoping
it would tag mail from a domain as spam but it seem not to be working
any hints?
Header TEST_FROM From =~ /adomainname/i
describe TEST_tandom this is a test rr
score TEST_FOR_SPAM 7.0
___
Spam
thanks;
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:47:44 -0500
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:35:50PM -0500, Landy Roman wrote:
> | nice article in LM about spamassassin, i hope the spammers don't
> | read it
>
> Doesn't make much difference. The
nice article in LM about spamassassin, i hope the spammers don't read it
i am kind of confused on custom spamassassin
if i want to add rules i would have to do them in user_prefs? do they
overright the default rules or just add to them? also, are the default
rules visible in any file?
___
where do these rules go?
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:16:31 -0800
Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a couple rules I wrote to help catch stuff that was making it
> through. The scores are my own made-up numbers
>
> body INCREASE_EJACULATION /increase ejaculation/i
> describ
this tool really stops spam :-
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
59 matches
Mail list logo
