Re: [SAtalk] Memory utilization buildup

2003-09-29 Thread Klaus Mueller
There was already a bug database entry (#2476). It's fixed with 2.60 by removing timelog. A workaround is appended to the bug report. Klaus --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___

Re: [SAtalk] Timelog in 2.60 or lack thereof

2003-09-24 Thread Klaus Mueller
Ben M. VanWagner wrote: > > Has it been replaced ??? Hi, it's removed in the last release canditate I think. Check the release notes. Klaus --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

Re: [SAtalk] SA Gone Wild???

2003-09-22 Thread Klaus Mueller
> -1.0/5.0 -1.0 ist less then the required 5 points. This is not identified as spam. Mail is spam if it reaches the 5.0 points or is above. Can you send the complete mail header (x-out the adresses). This part is not enough to help you. Klaus --

Re: [SAtalk] Increasing memory with SA 2.55 problem

2003-09-18 Thread Klaus Mueller
Jason Brunette wrote: > Problem is timelog() in Mail::SpamAssassin. Thank you for the expalination. > spamd doesn't have this problem because the timelog log entries are > stored in a forked spamd process which dies after a message is > scanned. The problem occurs if you use a modified version o

Re: [SAtalk] Increasing memory with SA 2.55 problem

2003-09-17 Thread Klaus Mueller
Hi, I did some more tests today. I installed the "Devel::Leak" perl package on the linux computer. This can be used to count number of "object" instances. I hope the package works ok because it's an very early version number (0.02). Test: I added the data count function at five different parts of

Re: [SAtalk] Test rule in spamassassin blocks my domains

2003-09-17 Thread Klaus Mueller
spamassassin-talk wrote: > Odd-Jarle, > > How about just incorporating the Habeas warrant mark > http://www.habeas.com/faq/index.htm in your e-mail headers? > > According to http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html HABEAS_SWE is > worth -4.6 points, more than enough to offset FROM_OFFERS. I think it

Re: [SAtalk] Test rule in spamassassin blocks my domains

2003-09-17 Thread Klaus Mueller
Ken Gordon wrote: > > I'm not sure this helps him. His problem is that other people can't > get his mail. Are you proposing that he provide all his > correspondents with a rule that would make it possible for his email > to circumvent SA? How will he let them know? Send them an email > enclosing t

Re: [SAtalk] Test rule in spamassassin blocks my domains

2003-09-17 Thread Klaus Mueller
Kristoffersen wrote: > > As you can see kristOFFERSen.us/.no would match this rule. Create a rule matching exact you domain with the same negative score. Or add your domain to whitelist. Klaus --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek W

[SAtalk] Increasing memory with SA 2.55 problem

2003-09-16 Thread Klaus Mueller
Hi, I have a problem with increasing memory usage of SpamAssassin on windows (spamc/spamd). I created a stand alone test program to check if the increasing memory is a problem of communication code or SA. The program tests the sample-spam.txt file using a loop of 1000 times. Result (Win2k SP4; Ac

Re: [SAtalk] Re: CYGWIN spamc/spamd

2003-09-15 Thread Klaus Mueller
Fred I-IS.COM wrote: > Is this because of running SpamD under AS perl? I am planning to run > SpamD under CYGWIN perl. Are there any problems with this setup? I > have it working all except net tests, having trouble getting Net::DNS > to work for CYGWIN... I'm using 2.6rc4 Hi, I do not know i

Re: [SAtalk] Re: CYGWIN spamc/spamd

2003-09-15 Thread Klaus Mueller
Michael Bell wrote: > > Not to take away from your very fine work Klaus, but unless you've > fixed it, your spamd has a serious memory leak (it did for 2.55) > which I reported to you back in July or so. Not too noticeable for > casual POP3, but for a full mail server feed, the machine will > proba

Re: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

2003-09-15 Thread Klaus Mueller
Fred I-IS.COM wrote: > > Quoted from their page: One more quote: 'SpamAssassin' is a trademark of Network Associates, Inc. Is this correct or wrong? Klaus --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkg

Re: [SAtalk] cygwin + sa?

2003-09-15 Thread Klaus Mueller
Fred wrote: > Has anyone on this list installed SA with cygwin? > I'd like to start using spamc + spamd and my only > option appears to be cygwin. Is this safe for production? Hi, I have this running on my computer. It works without problem. I need cygwin to run spamc only. SpamD and sa-learn ru

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin and windows

2003-09-03 Thread Klaus Mueller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Will the program run on MS windows NT and/or 2000 servers? If so how? You may read http://www.openhandhome.com/howtosa250.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie - Why no score for equal From: and To: address?

2003-08-14 Thread Klaus Mueller
Hi, I filter on the received line: received: from mokes [210.58.26.191] by gwdg.de with MailMXPro(2195.5766); The MailMXPro seems to be unique for some spam mails. I did not found this word in any other mail. Bye Klaus --- This SF.Net email

Re: [SAtalk] spamc vs spamassassin result codes

2003-08-14 Thread Klaus Mueller
Hi, I reported the same problem some day ago ("Difference between Spamc and spamassassin on Win32") but did not get a reply. I think it's a small change to spamc only. Klaus --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites inc

Re: [SAtalk] spamc vs spamassassin result codes

2003-08-14 Thread Klaus Mueller
Hi, I reported the same problem some day ago ("Difference between Spamc and spamassassin on Win32") but did not get a reply. I think it's a small change only. Klaus --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Da

Re: [SAtalk] SA integration with Outlook and Exchange server

2003-08-01 Thread Klaus Mueller
Harri Pesonen wrote: > > Is it possible to integrate SA with Outlook client, when I use > Exchange server, not POP3? Or at least clean the Inbox periodically > if tight integration is not possible. Hi, I created a small JAVA program for this. The program connects to the Exchange Server using IMAP

Re: [SAtalk] Spam scored above threshhold but is not tagged.

2003-07-31 Thread Klaus Mueller
John Schneider wrote: > I received a spam email this morning that looks like it scored high > enough to be tagged spam but was not. > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-17.6 required=5.0 > > If anyone has any comments or ideas about this, I would appreciate > hearing them. Thank you. Hi, it's commented

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Folder

2003-07-31 Thread Klaus Mueller
Evan Platt wrote: > > SpamAssassin - SA-Talk is for SpamAssassin for Unix. Are you running Hi, is there a special SA list for SpamAssassin in Windows or can I send inquieres on this list too? Should I tag may subject if question is windows related, e.g. [W32] . And I did not get a hint on sendin

[SAtalk] Difference between Spamc and spamassassin on Win32

2003-07-29 Thread Klaus Mueller
Hi, the spamassassin perl module on windows (spamassassin.bat) returns an exit code of 0 if the checked mail not spam and 1 if spam (command line switch -e) AND changes the message. The spamc can filter the message (no parameter) OR set the exit code (parameter -c). It's not possible to filter the

[SAtalk] [Featurerequest] Provide a serial operation mode for SpamD

2003-07-29 Thread Klaus Mueller
Hi, I'm currently testing spamc and spamd on windows. I got it already working (replaced syslog, signal handling and user things). But there is one big problem. The fork() function is not working well on windows. I changed the code for my test to run serial. Spamd checks one at a time only. This

Re: [SAtalk] Annoying message

2003-07-23 Thread Klaus Mueller
Matt Kettler wrote: > > SpamAssassin doesn't generally run on a windows desktop type computer > (it's quite difficult to do so). It's usually run by ISP's and > companies on their mailservers. Hi, it does here for some months. And I got running SpamD/SpamC since two weeks. It's fast and without p

Re: [SAtalk] SPAM rule for big@boss.com

2003-07-22 Thread Klaus Mueller
Did you try: blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Klaus --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual mach

Re: [SAtalk] Imap and windows/ spam assassin rules

2003-07-21 Thread Klaus Mueller
Hi, someone asked for the Java program I made but I lost his mail address (store at home but I can not reach currently). So I use this way to send the files I made. I create a ZIP and placed on webserver: www.my-mueller.com/projects/hamstertool/hamstertool-0.001.zip I only clean up the code and

Re: [SAtalk] Imap and windows/ spam assassin rules

2003-07-19 Thread Klaus Mueller
Peter Doherty wrote: > has anyone had success using spam assassin and imap on windows. > > i have tried to download imap assassin, but i cant get the > imapassassin.pl file to run it just loads up in a perl window then > vanishes Hi, I do not know about the IMAP module of Spamassassin. But I can