Re: [SAtalk] Two tests

On Tuesday 22 October 2002 04:06, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have two rules that is not in my Spamassassin, so I thought I'd > > share them. > > Could you please submit your rule suggestion as a bug report? That >

Re: [SAtalk] Trick to bypass Razor

lid concern. However, looking at the announcement just posted here, it seems to be addressed in v2 of the Razor. Very nice. Best, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Astrophysicist/IT Consultant/Skeptic/Ski-orienteer/Orienteer/Mountaineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL P

Re: [SAtalk] Thresholds, spamtraps

andwidth, but about my time... Whereas rejected messages is likely to cause another bounce and I may have to look into what was rejected, a devnulled message will be forgotten forever... Best, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Astrophysicist/IT Consultant/Skeptic/Ski-orienteer/Orienteer/Mountaine

Re: [SAtalk] Thresholds, spamtraps

On Monday 10 June 2002 16:58, Vivek Khera wrote: > >>>>> "KK" == Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > KK> The scoring systems seems like a very nice feature, and I figured > it KK> would be nice to use it with several different threshold

[SAtalk] Thresholds, spamtraps

p catches it, and it is sent to other users just after being sent to the spamtrap, would it be caught? Is the address added to a local blacklist too? Best, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Astrophysicist/IT Consultant/Skeptic/Ski-orienteer/Orienteer/Mountaineer [EMAIL PROTECTE