On 24 Jul 2003, Raul Dias wrote:
> Something I found interesting was using Razor + Pyzor + Dcc.
> Then I create meta rules that matchs:
> Razor + Pyzor
> Razor + Dcc
> Pyzor + Dcc
> Razor + Pyzor + Dcc (this will also, of course, match all three before).
This is definitely an interesting idea! Bu
> > What really pissed me off the other day was that I got some
> > spam which got a low bayes score (and hence -5) but a high razor
> > score (and hence +2 or so) so I ended up getting it...
>
> Now that is an interesting dilema. Since I don't run Bayes I don't run into
> that situation. Your
Thanks a lot to the many users of this list that have suggested, both via
the list and via personal email, various pro's and con's about my
suggestions. Ultimately the conclusions I drew were unsurprising:
(1) They're the default settings because they seem to work best for people
in general.
> > I know I can change the point scoring system in spamassassin, but I don't
> > get the logic of the default set-up here: if an email is listed in Razor2,
> > then how can it not be spam?
>
> It could be a newsletter or another legit mail, that has been
> erraneously reported to Razor. This is
ster will
befall me when I change my default set-up so that it does get 100 million
billion points?
Kevin Buzzard
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Foru
