Re: [SAtalk] Extremely expensive SA calls

2003-09-26 Thread Justin Shore
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote: > >If I eliminate the SA -d call then that leaves me with only one other > >CPU-draining call: SA -r > > > ># Report to Pyzor > >:0 Wc > >| /usr/bin/pyzor report > > > ># Report to Razor > >:0 Wc > >| spamassassin -r > > > >Now one thing I never thought a

Re: [SAtalk] Extremely expensive SA calls

2003-09-26 Thread Justin Shore
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote: > No, however maybe I missed something in your description, but it sounds > like you're doing automated reporting to both pyzor and razor ? If you are, > please don't do that, both razor and pyzor specifically ask that only spam > verified by a human be

Re: [SAtalk] Extremely expensive SA calls

2003-09-25 Thread Justin Shore
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote: > If you're using procmail anyway, why not use FormMail to strip SpamAssassin > headers ? Apart from the Subject if you have subject rewriting enabled, > SpamAssasin doesn't change any headers, it just adds specific new headers. > I'd bet anything that

[SAtalk] Extremely expensive SA calls

2003-09-25 Thread Justin Shore
Howdy all. My current installation involves calling SA from MIMEDefang which in turn is called from Sendmail. Enough background info. I'm currently calling spamassassin from a procmail recipe on a spamtrap account. The recipe does various bits of munging including sed calls to strip sensitive

Re: [SAtalk] OT: SCO may have violated GNU

2003-06-11 Thread Justin Shore
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Duncan Findlay wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 02:27:35PM -0400, Shayne Lebrun wrote: > > Hai; note also that for all the random people on the street know, said > > company went directly to the SA copyright holder, and got a license all > > their own, separate from the GPL/AL

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 ./configure and CONTACT_ADDRESS request

2003-06-11 Thread Justin Shore
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Justin Mason wrote: > > Justin Shore said: > > > Would it be possible for the developers to add a ./configure option for > > CONTACT_ADDRESS so that people like myself can easily compile and install > > the latest 2.60 from CVS nightly? Now tha

[SAtalk] 2.60 ./configure and CONTACT_ADDRESS request

2003-06-11 Thread Justin Shore
Would it be possible for the developers to add a ./configure option for CONTACT_ADDRESS so that people like myself can easily compile and install the latest 2.60 from CVS nightly? Now that ./configure asks for this piece of information, I have to break out good old expect to answer the questio

Re: [SAtalk] Really OT: Microsoft buys out RAV

2003-06-10 Thread Justin Shore
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Steve Thomas wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 03:37:12PM -0400, Shayne Lebrun is rumored to have said: > > > > > The *only* way to pull that off is to totally ignore security updates > > > (and the subsequent reboot). No thanks. :) > > > > Yes, and for an internal machine,

RE: [SAtalk] Why is this lists Reply-To: Header set to the wrongaddress?

2003-06-09 Thread Justin Shore
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Ben Johansen wrote: > Ok, Here is an example of the headers I receive from a normal post from > the list. > > If I click the Reply button, I get spamassassin-talk-admin > > Is this a M$ LookOut thing ;-) Need you ask? :-) I'd be willing to bet Mason's next paycheck that it

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade to 2.5?

2003-06-09 Thread Justin Shore
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Scott Rothgaber wrote: > Good Morning! > > After hearing about SpamAssassin on the BSDI-Users list I decided to > build a box and check it out. Most impressive! I'm running v2.43 from > the FreeBSD 5.0 ports collection. > > Questions: > > 1) This version seems to be doing th

Re: [SAtalk] Using multiple DNSBLs of the same type

2003-06-02 Thread Justin Shore
On 2 Jun 2003, Yorkshire Dave wrote: > The only rules I've added so far have been 5 or 6 DNSBL rules and one to > catch my X-SpamTrap: header. I started laying out a list of DNSBL rules > and how they need to be organised and grouped for scoring but I haven't > got very far yet. I hadn't thought

Re: [SAtalk] Using multiple DNSBLs of the same type

2003-06-02 Thread Justin Shore
Howdy, Dave. Thanks for the reply. On 2 Jun 2003, Yorkshire Dave wrote: > Call them all and use a meta || rule for the score, or call and score > them all then use a meta && rule to subtract some score back off, that's > what I'm doing here > > meta Z_OPEN_PROXY (X_OSIRU_OPEN_PROXY || X_OSIRU_O

[SAtalk] Using multiple DNSBLs of the same type

2003-06-02 Thread Justin Shore
I noticed a problem just now that I really hadn't though about before. I recently added a number of DNSBLs to my sa-mimedefang.cf that weren't in the stock SA (2.6.0-cvs). proxy.relays.osirusoft.com socks.relays.osirusoft.com all of blackholes.us's country zones, not providers 7 SORBS BLs proxi

[SAtalk] OT: Randomly picking X addresses from a file

2003-05-31 Thread Justin Shore
Since it's a slow night on the list I thought I'd ask an OT question too. It doesn't directly pertain to SA but it does pertain to anti-spam fun. Please excuse it nevertheless. Background: I have a text file of userids. It's has a very large number of userids. I can quickly append one of a