[SAtalk] Spamassassin With qmail

Where I can Find documentation about integration of spamassassin and qmail. Thanks --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bullet

[SAtalk] spamassassin WEB interface

Where I can found spamassassin in web interface??... I read once in this list that exist a spamassassin in web interface??. Where I can found! Bye! --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-

[SAtalk] spamassassin SERVER

I separated spamassassin of the MTA in another host. This works very good, but sometimes in the spamassassin host there are many mails and the response times are high for the MTA which implies a timeout and therefore, some mails are not analyzed... The flag -t segs not works... Any help... o

[SAtalk] spamassassin SERVER

I separated spamassassin of the MTA in another host. This works very good, but sometimes in the spamassassin host there are many mails and the response times are high for the MTA which implies a timeout and therefore, some mails are not analyzed... The flag -t segs not works... Any help...

Re: [SAtalk] Global bayes path

On Tuesday 24 June 2003 15:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Jose M.Herrera wrote on Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:09:42 -0400: > > In local.cf I set the option bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes to > > do global bayes's database for my users and not for each user... but... i > >

[SAtalk] spamassassin server

In my work, we have a lot of mail servers. My idea is put a spamassassin server where any mail server in my domain can connect to the server to analize spams. It is posible?? Bye! --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web

Re: [SAtalk] Little bayes question

On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 07:53 PM 6/9/2003 -0400, Jose M.Herrera wrote: > >On Friday 06 June 2003 11:29, Germán D. Staltari wrote: > > > It could be global or for each user. Better results when is applied for > > > each user. > > > >How I

Re: [SAtalk] Little bayes question

> > The bayes database is global or for each user. > > It could be global or for each user. Better results when is applied for > each > user. > ... ok.. and... global AND each user (both). It is posible?? Thanks --- This SF.NET email

[SAtalk] Spamassassin vs spamd vs spamc

What is the difference to put in procmailrc, "| spamassassin", "| spamd" or "|spamc" I know spamassassin is a whole program (spamd + spamc), spamd is a demonized version and spamc is a client who read for STDIN, and then taked by spamd... but what the difference???.. performance??... In m

Re: [SAtalk] Little bayes question

On Friday 06 June 2003 11:29, Germán D. Staltari wrote: > It could be global or for each user. Better results when is applied for > each user. How I do that?... I know train bayes but for each user.. Thanks --- This SF.net email is sponsored

[SAtalk] Little bayes question

The bayes database is global or for each user. Thank --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 f

[SAtalk] Spamassassin & sa-learn

I put in my procmail " | spamassassin", what is the difference of put "spamd -f"??? And... the bayes database is global or for each user??? Thanks. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://ad

[SAtalk] Procmail

Why is necesary put DROPPRIVS=yes in /etc/procmailrc ??? What is DROPPRIVS for? Thanks -- *.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.* Jose Miguel Herrera M. - User #246070 counter.li.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Est.Ing.Civil Informatica - UTFSM Servicios Centrales - Depto.I

[SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd

Can I put the IP number of the mail server in whitelist_from_rcvd. I' mean: whitelist_from_rcvd *mydomain.com x.y.z.k Bye! -- *.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.* Jose Miguel Herrera M.     - User #246070 counter.li.org jherrera[@]inf.utfsm.cl - Est.Ing.Civ

[SAtalk] validation with nis

I would like to validate in all mails the user with the nis service. Is possible?? Bye! -- *.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.* Jose Miguel Herrera M.     - User #246070 counter.li.org jherrera[@]inf.utfsm.cl - Est.Ing.Civil Informática - UTFSM *.*.*.*.*.*.*

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_recv??

On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Evan Platt wrote: > >what mean the last two columns in the sintaxis of whitelist_from_recv? > > > >I means, > >whitelist_from_recv *mymail.com mymail.com > > --- -- > >*mymail.com is the mail and the other?.. is the mail server?

[SAtalk] whitelist_from_recv??

I Have a question!. what mean the last two columns in the sintaxis of whitelist_from_recv? I means, whitelist_from_recv *mymail.com mymail.com --- -- *mymail.com is the mail and the other?.. is the mail server? Thanks. -- *.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*

[SAtalk] logs

Can I put the spamd log's in a file?. Bye! -- *.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.* Jose Miguel Herrera M.     - User #246070 counter.li.org jherrera[@]inf.utfsm.cl - Est.Ing.Civil Informática - UTFSM *.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.

[SAtalk] in whitelist?

Look the analisis. USER_IN_WHITELIST???. that domain I don't have in my whitelist ** From: =?Big5?B?pXilXw==?= 2370-3090 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: =?Big5?B?p9ao06fkLi4uLrdzqkKkzSAuvXSl97Fxs2+4zLZ9qWw=?= . =?Big5?B?MjRItaWpcLPhLi4uLg==?= Content-Type: text/html Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 15:45:28

Re: [SAtalk] base64 code

On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Suzanne Skinner wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:01:14PM -0300, Jose M.Herrera wrote: > > >> Try adding this line to your config file: > >> > >> defang_mime 0 > > > Thanks... but excuse by my ignorance, but what f

Re: [SAtalk] base64 code

On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Suzanne Skinner wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:09:24PM -0300, Jose M.Herrera wrote: > > > Mail who are SPAM (***SPAM***) are codified with base64. some mail that > > they have HTML, pictures, etc, are decodified of a strange form that I > > ca

Re: [SAtalk] tag removal

ot;| spamassassim"... because spamassasim run like a command, however spamc is comunicate with spamd by means of daemon. or I am mistaken? bye! > > []'s > Ronan > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 12:10:30 -0300 (CLST) > "Jose M.Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

[SAtalk] base64 code

Hi. (firs, sorry form my english) I use spamassassin since 2 month and all ok, but I have a problem with some mails. Mail who are SPAM (***SPAM***) are codified with base64. some mail that they have HTML, pictures, etc, are decodified of a strange form that I cannot read nothing of the mail.

Re: [SAtalk] tag removal

On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Alan Lehman wrote: > For the occasional false positives, I would like to have an automated method to >"clean" the SA tags. > My thought was to create a mailbox with a procmail recipe to clean the email and >return it to the sender. It might look > something like: > > :0 fw