Re: [SAtalk] Problem upgrading SA

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:08:54PM -0800, Evan Platt wrote: > --On Tuesday, January 27, 2004 1:46 PM -0800 John Oliver > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I had SA 2.60 and just installed 2.63 via CPAN. spamassassin -V tells > > me I have 2.63 now, but the headers of my

[SAtalk] Problem upgrading SA

I had SA 2.60 and just installed 2.63 via CPAN. spamassassin -V tells me I have 2.63 now, but the headers of my emails still say 2.60 How can I make certain that mail is being scanned by 2.63? -- John Oliver, CCNAhttp://www.john-oliver.net/ Linux/UNIX/network

[SAtalk] How to make SA "learn" from spam?

I'm led to believe I can feed untagged spam (and tagged non-spam) to SA for it to "learn" how to be better. How do I do this? -- John Oliver, CCNAhttp://www.john-oliver.net/ Linux/UNIX/network consulting http://www.john-ol

Re: [SAtalk] Blocking of bouncing addresses

. I've asked about "reversing" FEATURE(`blacklist_recipients') in comp.mail.sendmail, but haven't had an answer. I'm in the same boat, but also have considerably more than 64kb/s to work with... :-) > anybody got any thoughts on a live blocking setup or seen a decent l

[SAtalk] SpamAssassin getting around dnsbls?

they work... I can look through the logs and see hundreds of denied connections. So, why did this piece of mail make it through sendmail to SpamAssassin? I don't see how SpamAssassin could be causing it, but... I know my dnsbls *are* working. -- John Oliver, CCNA

[SAtalk] Why four scores?

/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf ? -- John Oliver, CCNAhttp://www.john-oliver.net/ Linux/UNIX/network consulting http://www.john-oliver.net/resume/ ******* ******** Contribute to the SpamCon Legal F

Re: [SAtalk] What is marked as spam

ges -- if you can't > target Swen using an anti-virus program, check out the > MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE rule and score -- I have this set to 15.00, and it > catches all live viruses (those with active and executable components). I'll look into that... thanks for the lin

[SAtalk] What is marked as spam

missing something really big and important here... :-) -- John Oliver, CCNAhttp://www.john-oliver.net/ Linux/UNIX/network consulting http://www.john-oliver.net/resume/ ******* ******** Contribute to the SpamCon

Re: [SAtalk] DNSBL observations and a couple of questions

of my clients happily use SPEWS ;-) I would recommend to *not* use bl.spamcop.net at the MTA for a large-scale, production server... even *they* say not to. It's too easy to game SpamCop. -- John Oliver, CCN

[SAtalk] Getting SA going

How do I proceed? -- John Oliver, CCNAhttp://www.john-oliver.net/ Linux/UNIX/network consulting http://www.john-oliver.net/resume/ ******* ******** Contribute to the SpamCon Legal Fund!! http://www.s