Re: [SAtalk] Header problem, intermittent, SpamAssassin 2.60 rc3

2003-09-07 Thread Jerry Glomph Black
y local.cf was not being read, and a lot of unexpected behaviour ensued. My understanding is that this PREFIX problem is being fixed in the actual release, so that upgrades will not break. On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:30:16AM -0700, Jerry Glomp

Re: [SAtalk] Header problem, intermittent, SpamAssassin 2.60 rc3

2003-09-07 Thread Jerry Glomph Black
06:51AM -0700, Jerry Glomph Black wrote: > > I've gotten a few spams which were scored appropriately, such as: > > the example below, which got 12.7 spampoints. > > > > BUT: the X-Spam-Status header indicates a score of 0.7 points! Why is this > > very partial sum

[SAtalk] Header problem, intermittent, SpamAssassin 2.60 rc3

2003-09-07 Thread Jerry Glomph Black
I've gotten a few spams which were scored appropriately, such as: the example below, which got 12.7 spampoints. BUT: the X-Spam-Status header indicates a score of 0.7 points! Why is this very partial sum being used for this header? This problem happens for about 1% of the spams I get. Have use