zeek:
> [..] 2.41 scans take about 1-4 seconds, but the 2.50 are taking at
> least 30. Any ideas?
Same here: scanning the logs, 2.50 in fact seems to take a rough 30
seconds longer than 2.44 did.
It's not a perl 5.8/utf8 issue. I wonder what this can be - which check
is taking this long, and ho
Sean Rima (9/6/02 22:05 +0100) [[SAtalk] C version]:
>Is there any word on the C version of SA as I am getting him by
>performance issuses.
A C version of the daemon, you mean? Or are you running "spamassassin -P"?
Using the C client (spamc) against a local spamd (perl), most messages
(about 75
