One problem: If a spamassassin --lint fails (because if you, oh, had
outdated directives in your sa-mimedefang.cf file), then once you correct
that, on the next run, rules_du_jour won't update anything, because it
thinks everything is up to date.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Thielen"
> I've read all three of your posts.. and don't have any suggestions to help
> you.. it looks like a bug to me.
OK, I've opened bug #2734 on it...
> What really makes me wonder is why the ip=none entry exists at all.
>
> Have you been doing something like spamassassin --add-addr-to-whitelist?
>
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Levitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jay Levitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 9:29 AM
Subject: Second request: AWL false hits
> Hi.. does anyone have any ideas on this? I have read the FAQ, and this
d
> Each day I see a new message by this guy and add a new rule to find his
> tracking codes. Your original un-munged e-mail address was in that base64
> text of that header.
Since only a spam or two a day gets through from him, it's probably not
worth it - one of the disadvantages of being a one-p
My server handles exactly one mailbox: my own. I am running SA 2.60 through
MimeDefang, with some MimeDefang changes to enable AWL processing.
I've noticed an increasing amount of spam getting through that uses the
age-old trick of forging my address in the From: line. This somehow
triggers the
ese are spam.)
I'm using a site-wide bayes file, since I'm the
only user. Every time I upgrade SA, I wipe out the bayes database, and
re-train SA on my inbox, some spam-free archives of my mailing lists, on the
"probably spam" folder (5
How can I do a better job of training
bayes?
Jay Levitt
are, not the client itself. We always used X-Mailer,
and I don't believe that's changed.
Likewise, since the headers are put there by the server, if it didn't go
through the server, the header must be forged.
Jay Levitt
---
This S
The LOTS_OF_STUFF rule will match URLs of the
following type:
http://1.2.123.3/images/something.gif
I'm not sure what, if anything, would be a better
solution....
Jay Levitt
click on them, but take a look at the initials of
each college and see if you detect a (somewhat juvenile) pattern...
Jay Levitt
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and F
. Any ideas, anyone?
Jay Levitt
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Sorry, but the AWL is only conceptually valid when applied to a single
> user's mail at a time. Applying it globally to multiple users at a time
has
> a tendency to cause problems, particularly if you ALL_SPAM_TO some users
in
> your network.
In my case, sitewide IS a single
And conversely, why don't I have one? (Mandrake 9.0, built 2.50 myself with
default configure) Not even an empty file.
I gather that one should be created by the --rebuild option. However, on my
Athlon 1.7GHz, the "fast" sa-learn --no-rebuild option takes half an hour to
scan my 7200-message in
12 matches
Mail list logo
