Re: [SAtalk] Is bl.spamcop.net gone?

* Tom Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031108 08:52]: > > -Original Message- > > > > IIRC, bl.spamcop.net isn't supposed to resolve. Try running an RBL > > > query against it instead of trying to resolve it. > > > > > > > > Surely it has to resolve to *something* - the NS records have >

[SAtalk] razor

Well, I'm still seeing the bad file descriptor problem with Razor, even after applying the patch per the readme file. I found two instances of Razor, I patched them both. What am I forgetting? SA 2.60, FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE, sendmail 8.12.8 Thanks. -jav --

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf ignored by SA 2.6

* Dominic Germain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030925 17:34]: > Hi, > > > I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup I > already done on my "real" server. There is 2 differences: I use SA > 2.60 instead of 2.55 and I use Perl 5.6.0 instead of 5.8.0... I can't > figure why S