Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

2003-12-17 Thread Jason Lieurance
Theo Van Dinter said: > That said, try running the sample-spam.txt message through "spamassassin" and > see what comes out. If it's doing the markup appropriately there, it's > definitely a qmail-scanner issue. If it's not, run with -D and see if it's > complaining about anything. spamassassin

Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

2003-12-17 Thread Jason Lieurance
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:27:46 -0500 From: Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jason Lieurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EM

Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

2003-12-17 Thread Jason Lieurance
Theo Van Dinter said: > When you say it does "NOTHING", are there any X-Spam-* headers? It tags the message with X-Spam-Status: YES/NO and the hits number but no list of the tests it ran, no rewrite of the subject, and no attachment of the original. 2.55 did all these things and I don't see the p

[SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

2003-12-17 Thread Jason Lieurance
Hello, I posted yesterday about how we upgraded to 2.61 from 2.55 and the subjuct would not rewrite even though the local.cf told it to. Someone advised to run 'spamassassin --lint' and fix the syntex errors which I did but it did not work. Also, when it tagged a message SPAM yes/no it used to lis

Re: [SAtalk] SA not following local.cf in SA 2.61

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lieurance
Matt Kettler said: > That should be self explanatory.. your ok_locales statement is invalid... you've > got an ok_locales statement, but nothing after it... > That's not what I meant but anyway, I did as you suggested and ran it again with no errors. Thanks, for your help. Jason ---

Re: [SAtalk] SA not following local.cf in SA 2.61

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lieurance
Matt Kettler said: > At 09:30 AM 12/16/03 -0500, Jason Lieurance wrote: >>Just upgraded to SA 2.61 from SA 2.55 and it appears SA 2.61 is not reading or >> following the whole local.cf as it should. > > I'd start off by running spamassassin --lint and fix the errors. >

[SAtalk] SA not following local.cf in SA 2.61

2003-12-16 Thread Jason Lieurance
Hello, Just upgraded to SA 2.61 from SA 2.55 and it appears SA 2.61 is not reading or following the whole local.cf as it should. I used the same local.cf from 2.55 and it is as follows: ** # SpamAssassin config file for version 2.5x # generated

[SAtalk] Need to change 'required hits' but no local.cf file

2003-09-03 Thread Jason Lieurance
Hello, I have a freebsd 4.7 mail server with qmail, courier-imap, and spamassassin 2.56 installed from the ports collection. The default of 'required_hits 5' I need to change to 7 or so. The trouble is I don't have a local.cf file and I have 100+ virtual users so $home/.spamassassin/user_prefs is