[SAtalk] false positive - please add to "nonspam" corpus

2002-12-20 Thread James R. Van Zandt
The announcement of Debian 3.0r1 was labeled as spam, with these hits: SPAM: Hit! (2.7 points) BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list SPAM: Hit! (2.4 points) BODY: No such thing as a free lunch (2) SPAM: Hit! (1.8 points) No MX records for the From: domain The mentions of "free" had to

Re: [SAtalk] How to use spamassassin headers in emacs rmail

2002-11-18 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Don Saklad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In emacs rmail, how do you use the spamassassin headers to get through > your email with the hundreds of spam commercial messages many now > with the additional lines of labelling from spamassassin?... I start my rmail session with C-c C-s C-d C-c C-s C-s

Re: [SAtalk] Fun with corpus pollution

2002-09-23 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ahh, you are deceived by truncation. They actually can match one > nonspam and still be 0.000% because the nonspam corpus is > 100k > messages :) I think that's a bug. The output precision should be increased. > If a given rule has 1 misplaced nonspa