[SAtalk] Ack...razor2 error =(

Hey all! Just saw this in my logs...: Jan 15 10:39:42 gateway spamd[11059]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in connect while running with -T switch at /usr/lib/perl5/i386-linux/IO/Socket.pm line 108, line 358. Anyone seen this? Thanks! James ___

[SAtalk] Bayes locked?

Hey all! Saw the following in my logs this morning: Dec 16 06:39:54 gateway spamd[9846]: Cannot open bayes databases /var/empty/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists Anyone else see this? Thanks! James __ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.55 running sweet, upgrade to 2.60 and no workie =(

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:15:35 -0500 (EST) "William Stearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good morning, James, > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, James Nonya wrote: > > > I'm running Slackware 8.1 which comes with perl 5.6.1. > > I've been running spamd

[SAtalk] SA 2.55 running sweet, upgrade to 2.60 and no workie =(

Hey all! I'm running Slackware 8.1 which comes with perl 5.6.1. I've been running spamd just fine since 2.55 was released. I compile and install SA 2.60 and all goes well. When I try to start spamd here's what I get: Insecure directory in $ENV{PATH} while running with -T switch at /usr/lib/per

Mystery Solved! [Was: Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist not whitelisting?}

--- Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --On Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:42:31 -0400 Theo Van > Dinter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:26:42AM -0700, James > Nonya wrote: > >> Yet the email is

[SAtalk] Whitelist not whitelisting?

Any reason why the whitelist *may* not be whitelisting? Kind of odd...I've tried both: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from @domain.net Yet the email is still processed. Anything I'm missing here? __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC