Re: [SAtalk] V-drug spam gets *0* hits on SA 2.55

2004-01-20 Thread Ivar Snaaijer
Scott A Crosby wrote: Read it and weep. :( Next question, how was it sent? The Received headers look relatively legit, so was this sent from a trojaned AOL user? I have *got* to implement that fuzzy matching algorithm. Scott [.. spam ..] I also get them even with 2.61. I have added a trigge

Re: [SAtalk] Wrapper script to speed up sa-learn?

2003-12-29 Thread Ivar Snaaijer
Dave Kliczbor wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello out there... I noticed that sa-learn sometimes is a bit too slow for my needs. I call sa-learn via: /usr/bin/sa-learn --no-rebuild --spam To speed the call itself up, I think about writing a script that loads the mailfile

[SAtalk] A different approach to spam

2003-12-29 Thread Ivar Snaaijer
Make the spammer pay: In the article it is mentioned that it seems a Microsoft idea, but I doubt that directly. Not that there are no good ideas coming from Redmond, just never new ones.  The link again (to copy yourself) : http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3324883.stm What would be the

Re: [SAtalk] [OT] Spammers won't like XP SP2

2003-12-16 Thread Ivar Snaaijer
Fred wrote: Microsoft announced that Outlook Express 6 is getting a change in behaviour in the next OS service Pack due out next year.  Starting with SP2, Outlook Express will no longer download external content (by default).  That means a large majority of IMAGE ONLY SPAMS won't wo

Re: [SAtalk] Need a rule for IE Exploit

2003-12-11 Thread Ivar Snaaijer
Fred wrote: Hello, I am out the door on my way to work but we need a rule for a new IE exploit just released, Visit this page, the exploit is harmless but to the spoofer, it's man's best friend. http://www.zapthedingbat.com/security/ex01/vun1.htm I think this should be put in the next SA release!