CG> carry a few spammers. Would we want to whitelist the AOL mail servers? |-P
Pick on the right people, AOL for their size generate very little
spam.
Now adelphia.net, level3 .. :-).
--
Ian
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by Eclipse
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:10:15AM -0600 Carl Chipman wrote :
> I've been subscribed for only a week, and there's 700+ messages from this
> list. Its great, but can make it possible for a person to totally miss a
> topic.
There is an archive and, it is searchable. Also if you are
subscribed - g
> My sa-learn is no longer working. I had it functioning under Mandrake 9.1
and
> again under Mandrake 9.2 upgraded from 9.1.
Check you have a perl module called DB_File installed. Without this,
sa-learn will quietly fail (unless you have debug switched on).
--
Ian
--
Run sa-learn with the debug flag and mostly you will see what is going
wrong.
--
Ian
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Trevor Rhodes
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 11:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Sa-learn
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 03:33:02AM -0700 JP Kelly wrote :
> Can someone tell me why auto-learn is failing here.
> >From the log:
Looks like your home dir is set to /dev/null - odd!
--
Ian
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welco
Hi,
> you will also need something like qmail-scanner,
> and need to patch and
> recompile qmail to support calling another
> queue...
One appendum to that advice ...
There are 4 great open source MTAs out there : Postfix, Exim, sendmail and
qmail.
3 support spam and AV scanning with no pat
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:26:50PM -0700 Steve Thomas wrote :
> router(config)# access-list 101 deny tcp any host 64.94.110.11 eq 80
Don't do this.
If Verisign are stupid enough to do this, let's make sure they get ALL the
traffic :-).
Also port 80 isn't the biggest problem: think mail thin
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 11:47:59AM -0700 Dan Kohn wrote :
> It's not that big a deal, but every message I have (ham and spam) is
> hitting RCVD_IN_SORBS and getting 0.1 points. Is the rule broken, or is
> there something strange about my mail?
Could very well be that your own mail relay (or that
