Re: [SAtalk] Spammers sneaking lower Bayes scores

2003-06-25 Thread Greg A
I have an issue with the whole Ham/Spam concept in SpamAssassin. I will define the terms in case you are not aware of the terminolgy used.    Ham=good wanted email Spam=bad unwanted email   SA gives supposed ham lower scores in a few areas, Bayes and auto-whitelist for instance.   I believe we sho

Re: [SAtalk] Spammers sneaking lower Bayes scores

2003-06-25 Thread Greg A
I have an issue with the whole Ham/Spam concept in SpamAssassin. I will define the terms in case you are not aware of the terminolgy used.    Ham=good wanted email Spam=bad unwanted email   SA gives supposed ham lower scores in a few areas, Bayes and auto-whitelist for instance.   I believe we sh

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.55 RedHat RPM

2003-06-25 Thread Greg A
That worked! Thanks to all who helped. Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:57:45PM -0700, Greg A wrote:> perl-Mail-Spamassassin = 2.53-1 spamassassin> perl-Mail-Spamassassin = 2.53-1 spamassassin-tools> *notice the above error refers to version

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.55 RedHat RPM

2003-06-23 Thread Greg A
The rpm rebuild for Redhat 8.0 did not work with the source rpm.   Note: I currently have Spamassassin 2.53 running on the system.   I did the following.   *downloaded 2.55 source rpm from link on SA website to VanDinter *copied to a new directory on the hard disk (any directory ok I guess?) *at te

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.55 RedHat RPM

2003-06-20 Thread Greg A
The SA src rpm rebuild for Redhat 8.0 did not work correctly for some reason.   Note: I currently have Spamassassin 2.53 running on the system.   I did the following.   *downloaded 2.55 source rpm from link on SA website to VanDinter *copied to a new directory on the hard disk (any directory ok I

SA in Mailshield by Lyris / (was) Re: [SAtalk] OT: SCO may have violated GNU

2003-06-12 Thread Greg A
The way I read the license was that you can not sell SA software. You can only charge for duplication fees, installation or maintenance but not for the software or customized versions derived from it. I could be wrong, I am not a lawyer...   The way some on the list have responded would suppose th

RE: [SAtalk] OT: SCO may have violated GNU

2003-06-11 Thread Greg A
How about this one?   http://www.mailshield.com/products/mailshield/server/whats_new.html   Mailshield now incorporates SpamAssassin and charges heaps of money for their product.   Anyone know if that is legal?       "Bingham, Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Open-source strikes back:http://www.ewe

[SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.55 RedHat RPM

2003-06-11 Thread Greg A
The Van Dinter SA 2.55 RPMs are only available for RedHat 7.3   For SA 2.53 there were Van Dinter RPMs for RedHat 7.3 and RedHat 8.0 both.   My question is this...   Has anyone used the 7.3 RPM with RedHat Linux 8.0 and does it work?   Thank you. Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easie