[SAtalk] Razor issue on Debian

2004-01-18 Thread Erik van der Meulen
ted! -- Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclip

Re: [SAtalk] Provider issue

2003-12-21 Thread Erik van der Meulen
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 12:29:26PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote: > Now I thought of the following scenario: > If I filter my incoming mail first with: > spamassassin -d > in order to get 'vanilla' messages (remove signs of my ISP's check) and > consecutivel

[SAtalk] Provider issue

2003-12-20 Thread Erik van der Meulen
sious when live mail is involved... Thanks a lot! -- Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM'

Re: [SAtalk] [Fwd: SA seems to recur messages]

2003-07-29 Thread Erik van der Meulen
Erik van der Meulen said: > I seem to have this odd issue with SA. It seems that whenever a message is > identified as spam, it gets passed through SA again in some mangled way. I have put > an example of such a mail on: > >www.avondel.nl/spamexample.txt I seem to have solv

[SAtalk] [Fwd: SA seems to recur messages]

2003-07-29 Thread Erik van der Meulen
rther, messages that do not get the required SA points, look just fine. I did try to think about this, but completely fail to understand what's wrong here. So any suggestions are much appreciated! Regards. -- Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

[SAtalk] SA seems to alternate messages

2003-07-28 Thread Erik van der Meulen
#x27;s wrong here. So any suggestions are much appreciated! Regards. -- Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Begin Quoted Spam - From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 28 22:26:03 2003 Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by souterrain with SpamAssassin (2.54 1.174.2.17-2003-05-11

Re: [SAtalk] No AWL with uucp?

2002-11-29 Thread Erik van der Meulen
procmail after which SA filters it with AWL... Regards and good luck! -- Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads

[SAtalk] Catching 'undisclosed receipients'

2002-10-10 Thread Erik van der Meulen
mails get though. I have tried to add a line to my user_prefs, but did not manage to get it right. Is there a proper way to do this? Thanks a lot (btw, is this a 'sound' practice at all, misusing SA for virus filtering?) Best regards. -- Erik va

Re: [SAtalk] Re: How to put hits in subject (Was Re: Why to deliver SPAM even if it's identified.)

2002-03-17 Thread Erik van der Meulen
little about the exact location and syntax of this modification? Thanks a lot. -- Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] Auto_whitelist after upgrade to 2.11

2002-03-17 Thread Erik van der Meulen
about 50 and I did not find a reference in the scores file. Any hints appreciated! -- Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Installation breaks

2002-03-15 Thread Erik van der Meulen
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:52:52PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:27:29 -0500, Greg Ward wrote: > > Finally, it *doesn't matter* -- I bet that using Perl's linker flags for > > spamc is unnecessary and irrelevant. So here's my t

Re: [SAtalk] Multiple Thresholds

2002-02-15 Thread Erik van der Meulen
associated action based on the 'X-Spam-Status' header. I would be interested in the results if you manage to set this up! Regards. -- Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://

Re: [SAtalk] Installation breaks

2002-02-14 Thread Erik van der Meulen
re, please let me know (instructions in Sesame Street language, but you lot must have figured that out by now ;-)). Thanks again! -- Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Installation breaks

2002-02-12 Thread Erik van der Meulen
o $(CFCCFLAG)' into the Makefile.PL (tried various places) and do 'perl Makefile.pl' and 'make', I get all sorts of errors. Feeling a little dumb here, but RTFM on Perl is out of my reach... -- Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

Re: [SAtalk] Installation breaks

2002-02-12 Thread Erik van der Meulen
s of this binary (from libperl): Built under linux Compiled at Apr 30 2000 12:08:38 @INC: /usr/lib/perl5/5.005/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.005 /usr/local/lib/site_perl/i386-linux /usr/local/lib/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5 . Puzzles me even more,

Re: [SAtalk] Installation breaks

2002-02-12 Thread Erik van der Meulen
es not inculde that particular option and build again? I am a little unsure in this field, have never coded a line in my life... Best regards. -- Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://li

[SAtalk] Installation breaks

2002-02-12 Thread Erik van der Meulen
Potato (I know there is a package for Woody/Sid, but upgrading is not an issue here). Any pointer or hint is much appreciated! -- Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourc