Re: [SAtalk] RE: *.easynet.nl DNSBL's ceasing on Dec 1, 2003 [OT]

2003-11-21 Thread Edward Shornock
Gary Carr wrote: This is a shame. The guy should do it for a fee and make it a small business. It *is* a shame, but did you read the original announcement? Maintainer of *.easynet.nl wrote: Isn't this all kinda sudden? - Yes. Sometimes, you just know that it's time to say goodbye. And the mome

Re: Fw: Undeliverable Mail: [SAtalk] SA-learn per VIRTUAL user

2003-11-14 Thread Edward Shornock
Marcio Merlone wrote: FYI. Begin forwarded message: Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:45:05 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Marcio Merlone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Undeliverable Mail: [SAtalk] SA-learn per VIRTUAL user Testing to see if my access file blocks this annoying bounce --

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin blocking by words

2003-11-13 Thread Edward Shornock
Zlatko Hristov wrote: Can SA block messages that contain certain words in the /header/body/subject ? Thank you. Zlatko. Yes =P --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest deve

Re: [SAtalk] OT: Administrivia: List mom, please disable the bouncing thewizard.net subscriber.

2003-11-12 Thread Edward Shornock
Matt Kettler wrote: At 02:14 PM 11/12/2003, Pedro Sam wrote: I had SA learn it as spam, and it never bothered me again :) Perhaps this is not the proper way of using SA, but it works. Or you can add "comingsoon.pool.com" to your /etc/mail/access file with a 550 rejection :) Received: from m

Re: [SAtalk] global whitelist in MySQL

2003-11-12 Thread Edward Shornock
ence,value) values ('@GLOBAL','whitelist_from','[EMAIL PROTECTED]'); Once you have this set up, if you want a PHP-based front-end, try the following: http://webuserprefs.pipegrep.net/ HTH -- Edward Shornock --

Re: [SAtalk] Razor/SA integration

2003-11-10 Thread Edward Shornock
Ken Bass wrote: Several people recommended "formail -s spamassassin -r < mbox_full_of_spam". Oops, sorry to have done the same (I didn't see this message when I wrote my reply)... --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19

Re: [SAtalk] Razor/SA integration

2003-11-10 Thread Edward Shornock
Ken Bass wrote: Since the messages are received post spamassassin processing they contain all the spamassassin stuff (marked-up-and put-in-an-attachment version). My understanding was that sa-learn is smart enough to ignore all its marked up stuff. I hope that it true even when it is given the '--

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie Questions

2003-11-07 Thread Edward Shornock
Chip Paswater wrote: Hey Guys, I apologize if these questions are asked somewhere, but I did browse the FAQ and documentation and didn't see an answer. I have a good understanding of Razor v2, but I just started using SA. 1. When reporting spam via spamassassin -r, can I supply an mbox instead

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin headers and bayes

2003-11-07 Thread Edward Shornock
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 09:55:38AM -0500, Jean-S?bastien Guay-Leroux wrote: I have a mailbox of approximately 300 emails and I want to learn them using sa-learn. Prior to learning them, I tried doing a : `spamassassin --remove-markup < Mailbox` won't work. spamassassin

Re: [SAtalk] Ignore_user setting ?

2003-11-07 Thread Edward Shornock
Paul M wrote: Thanks for your advice Edward, after editing the local.cf file do I have to restart SA for the changes to take effect? If you have it running via spamd/spamc, yes. Restart spamd and all should be well. :) --- This SF.net em

Re: [SAtalk] Ignore_user setting ?

2003-11-06 Thread Edward Shornock
Paul M wrote: We have spam assassin running, some users didnt get spam before hand and I wanted to know if there is a ignore_usr option to completely ignore specified email addresses? Thanks I think all_spam_to in local.cf is what you probably want. From Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf: whitelist_to

Re: [SAtalk] which folder?

2003-11-06 Thread Edward Shornock
Jim Knuth wrote: Hallo und guten Abend Edward, danke für die Email, die Du am 05.11.2003 um 02:15 schriebst - you wrote: Jim Knuth wrote: of course, I use Debian too. Why read SA in two folders (configs)? What is with /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf ? Ignore? Can I delete this? No, you canno

Re: [SAtalk] which folder?

2003-11-04 Thread Edward Shornock
Jim Knuth wrote: of course, I use Debian too. Why read SA in two folders (configs)? What is with /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf ? Ignore? Can I delete this? No, you cannot delete that, since /etc/mail/spamassassin is a symlink to ../spamassassin # ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin lrwxrwxrwx1 ro

Re: [SAtalk] Can't get add_header to work in 2.60

2003-11-04 Thread Edward Shornock
Dennis Duval wrote: I have tried to use the add_header feature in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf with no luck. It does not write the added header at all. However the local.cf file is being processed, because I can change required_hits and it has an effect. It works absolutely fine here, with SA

Re: [SAtalk] which folder?

2003-11-04 Thread Edward Shornock
Jim Knuth wrote: Hallo und guten Abend SA-List, which folder to the read the config is used? local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin or local.cf in /etc/spamassassin or user_prefs in /.spamassassin/ ?? On my system (Debian) the configs are read from: /etc/spamassassin/*.cf ~/.spamassassin/user_pr

Re: Undeliverable Mail: RE: [SAtalk] What is with all this ()*&(*& in my inbox?

2003-11-04 Thread Edward Shornock
Mike Kuentz (2) wrote: Is there some way to get who ever was registered from thewizard.net off the list? Looks like their domain expired, and I get a bounce from them every time I post to the list. I'm guessing every one else that posts to the list gets the bounce, also. Mike I get this annoyin

Re: [SAtalk] spamd using up all system memory and swap space

2003-11-04 Thread Edward Shornock
Dennis Duval wrote: I have to restart spamd within a couple of minutes after restarting syslogd with the init script or it will crash the system. However doing a killall -HUP syslogd has no affect on spamd and it continues logging. I know of no other applications that would crash a system as a r