Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2...

2003-10-02 Thread Dave Sill
"Ralf Guenthner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As you can see it works even without the -s stderr and there's also no need > for a separate /log/run script. > But there's more than one way to do it, obviously. This is off-topic for this list, but, yes, there's a need for a separate log/run script

Re: [SAtalk] spamd & qmail, round 2...

2003-09-30 Thread Dave Sill
Roger Merchberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have now created a run file using qmail's tcpserver & friends, here: > >/service/smtpd/run > >and this file contains: > >#!/bin/sh >exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 3200 \ > /usr/bin/spamd -s stderr -L -c 2>&1 5>&1 You mean /service/spamd/run,

Re: [SAtalk] spamc/spamd not checking all messages

2003-08-10 Thread Dave Sill
"Dallas L. Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Dave Sill wrote: >> >> What's happening is that some spam (~5-10/day out of 60-70) >> is not being checked correctly by spamd. For example, an >> obvious spam contains the header field: >>

[SAtalk] spamc/spamd not checking all messages

2003-07-30 Thread Dave Sill
I'm using 2.55 under Red Hat 8 and qmail with qmail-scanner-1.16. I *think* this problem started when I upgraded to 2.55 from 2.50, but I'm not sure. I'm using nearly the same configuration at home and not seeing this problem. What's happening is that some spam (~5-10/day out of 60-70) is not bein