[SAtalk] new mail containing old headers

Subject [SAtalk] new mail with old headers Is there a score for mail that comes in more than 4 days old? I had Nigerian spam come in today, that was properly flagged as such, and the date/time stamps from my server are accurate, but I would like to add additional weight for spamishness when all t

[SAtalk] new mail with old headers

Is there a score for mail that comes in more than 4 days old? I had Nigerian spam come in today, that was properly flagged as such, and the date/time stamps from my server are accurate, but I would like to add additional weight for spamishness when all the other Recieved or Date headers are more t

[SAtalk] Re: site wide BAYES

This is probably NOT a good idea (in general). Not everyone at your site will classify the same message in the same way. One or some of them may want to receive mortgage, hgh, viagra, or other home shopping spam in their "inbox". If you "know" all your users to make this decision for them (and no

Re: [SAtalk] Why doesn't 'spamc' work for me?

What about your procmail ENVironment? Redhat 8.0 has spamc in /usr/bin/spamc. Have you tried fully qualifying the pipe to spamc? Just trying to be helpful. Dan Liston Kaushik Mallick wrote: I am trying to filter all my emails thru SpamAssassin. I have 'spamd' start as a daemon service during

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Why doesn't 'spamc' work for me?

wered. I did come in late. What about `strace spamc` and ctrl-C out? Any clues there? Then again, that may be a linux command. Dan Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 02:55:12PM -0500, Daniel Liston wrote: Maybe I missed part of this thread, but shouldn't the process list be c

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Why doesn't 'spamc' work for me?

Maybe I missed part of this thread, but shouldn't the process list be checked for a daemon first? `ps -ef | grep spamd`? If it is not running, you need to start it. `spamd -d -c` seems safe enough. If it is running, but spamc is not talking to it, try using `spamassassin -P` instead of spamc just

Re: [SAtalk] Auto-dump email over a certain threshold?

Be very careful with a procmail recipe, and the answer is yes. #start by deleting the highest spamtag value :0 * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* /dev/null #flag everything else, but deliver it (this happens without any rules) #to deliver 5.0-19.9 to a special spam folder S

Re: [SAtalk] how to delete messages instead of just marking as [SPAM]

If you want to delete on a per mailbox basis, the individual $HOME/.procmailrc could have this recipe; :0 * ^Subject: \[SPAM\] /dev/null Dan Liston Gustave Eiffel wrote: Thanks. However not too sure how to do this: I have this in my /etc/procmailrc DROPPRIVS=yes :0fw * < 256000 | spamc Wh

Re: [SAtalk] Message not SPAM; score is 5.3 :-/

Porn site spam may include a password in a link that is only good for a few days. Not that I have ever followed one of them. I just forward everything like that off to spamcop. Unfortunately, I can't use spamassassin on my hotmail account. Dan Liston Jeremy Kister wrote: Just autowhitelist th

Re: [SAtalk] Possible spam signature

The first received: line with (8.9.3/8.9.3) would give me the impression that they are using sendmail. [shrug] Dan Nix wrote: On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Martin Radford stipulated: I'm pretty sure it's their own custom MTA. The SMTP connection banner is: It used to be a distorted MMDF variant, I

Re: [SAtalk] question re. reporting spam to razor

Here is another idea, and requires monitoring, but is easier than trying to unmunge a majordomo bounce to a spammer; /etc/aliases majordomo: "|/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo",filename Filename is actually an archive of all messages sent to the majordomo address. Dan Liston Miles Fidelman