[SAtalk] SPAMD stops tagging spam?

Environment is Fedora Core 1 (fully up-to-date w/ patches); SendMail 8.12.10-1.1.1 (Fedora Core RPM); SpamAssassin 2.63; spamass-milter 0.2.0+cvs. This server acts as a filtering relay in front of a Lotus Domino mail server. There are no user preferences. Yesterday, at approximately 5:20pm, m

[SAtalk] SPAMD stops tagging spam?

Sending this time from the address I'm subscribed to the list... sorry for the double posting, but my SpamAssassin relay server has just stopped filtering mail again. This time, while it was misbehaving, I sent a known spam to SPAMD through SPAMC at the command line: $ spamc -c < test yielded

[SAtalk] SPAMD stops tagging spam?

Sending this time from the address I'm subscribed to the list... sorry for the double posting, but my SpamAssassin relay server has just stopped filtering mail again. This time, while it was misbehaving, I sent a known spam to SPAMD through SPAMC at the command line: $ spamc -c < test yielded

Re: [SAtalk] sendmail and X-Envelope-From header

Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And I did try adding those headers on a test server to > see if it does work, and it does, $u actually puts <> around the email > address by itself and $g doesnt, so for them to look consistent, you want > > HX-Envelope-From: <$g> > HX-Envelope-To: $u

Re: [SAtalk] sendmail and X-Envelope-From header

Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any special reason you need the Envelope-Recipient ? If you run SA > from the local delivery agent you already know who the recipient is when > procmail is called, if you run SA from a filter like Mimedefang then there > are potentially *mul

Re: [SAtalk] sendmail and X-Envelope-From header

Yorkshire Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > sendmail.cf > > # > # Format of headers # > # > > blah > blah > > HX-Envelope-From: $g > HX-Envelope-To: $u Most Excellent!!! Works like a champ! Anybody have the sendmail.mc format? I've got my mi

RE: [SAtalk] Digest::SHA1 problems

Red Hat 8.0 also. Regards, Dan O'Brien __ Axon Solutions, Inc. Telephone: 703-845-8400 5827 Columbia Pike #502Facsimile: 703-845-5568 Falls Church, VA 22041

[SAtalk] sendmail and X-Envelope-From header

Am I correct in my observation that SendMail, in its default configuration, does *NOT* create the X-Envelope-From and X-Envelope-To headers? If so, how does one get SendMail to create them? Thanks, Dan O'Brien __ Axon Solutions

Re: [SAtalk] How long for spamd/razor check?

<10secs. Special thanks to Ed Kasky for pointing me in the right direction. Dan O'Brien __ Axon Solutions, Inc. Telephone: 703-845-8400 5827 Columbia Pike #502Facsimile: 703-845-5568 Falls Church, VA 220

Re: [SAtalk] How long for spamd/razor check?

I've enabled the name service cache daemon (nscd) to speed up DNS queries (I'm not using DNSBL). Haven't seen an appreciable change in throughput. Thanks, Dan O'Brien __ Axon Solutions, Inc. Telephone: 703-845

[SAtalk] How long for spamd/razor check?

or, but it's nice 'cuz it seems to get a number of "image" spams that wouldn't get caught by SA by itself. I'd welcome anybody's $0.02. Thanks, Dan O'Brien __ Axon Solutions, Inc. Telephone

Re: [SAtalk] How can i tell if razor is working?

Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > only problem is, i can't seem to figure out if its actually running it > or not -- anyone know how to tell? Use the "-D" (debug) option. If your running spamd (on Red Hat, at least), you can modify the /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin file to include "-

Re: [SAtalk] spamass-milter and /etc/aliases

mail stores are databases, I can do some slicing and dicing to identify domains to blacklist/whitelist, etc.) If your sendmail is config'd for local delivery, you should be able to redirect to a local account. Dan O'Brien Axon Solutions, Inc. ---