Re: [SAtalk] spamd choking on locks?

On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:08:56PM -0800, Dale Harris elucidated: > > I would have searched the archive for the but SF seems less than > helpful. I'm seeing a lot of errors like: > > Jan 20 03:44:11 skull spamd[27980]: lock: 27980 unlink of lock file > /home/rodmur/.

[SAtalk] spamd choking on locks?

unces? Dale --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org

[SAtalk] problems with spamd after updating spamassassin from 2.53 to 2.61

I am getting an error when trying to start spamd Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::untaint_var called at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 95. this started after I updated SpamAssassin from 2.53 to 2.61 can someone help? Thanks.

Re: [SAtalk] why is sa not catching the microsoft emails ?

On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 05:27:57PM -0400, Stephen Reese elucidated: > how do I turn up the MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE? > check out your .spamassassin/user_prefs file, it has directions in there. But it is basically like: score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 6.0 or some such.

Re: [SAtalk] why is sa not catching the microsoft emails ?

ests... > That and setting MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE to like 4.0 or higher seemed to do the trick mostly in 2.55. Well, except for the ones that didn't have an attachment, or just attached a GIF or something other than a virus laden file. -- Dale H

Re: [SAtalk] cannot open bayes db

se, little endian .spamassassin/bayes_toks: GNU dbm 1.x or ndbm database, little endian .spamassassin/user_prefs: ASCII English text Dale --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http:/

Re: [SAtalk] cannot open bayes db

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:21:13PM -0700, Dale Harris elucidated: > > Hey just upgraded to SA 2.6, now when I do a sa-learn I get: > > Cannot open bayes databases /home/rodmur/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: tie > failed: File exists > > So I'm guessing this is some inco

[SAtalk] cannot open bayes db

Hey just upgraded to SA 2.6, now when I do a sa-learn I get: Cannot open bayes databases /home/rodmur/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: tie failed: File exists So I'm guessing this is some incompatibility with db format, and I'm probably going to have to nuke my dbs and start again, right?

Re: [SAtalk] SA and razor not playing nice

iguration have been updated since the last time I installed, so I'm not sure which piece fixed our previous problems. I just know if works now, and perl isn't crashing 100 times a day, so I'm happy. :) I would suggest trying the latest Razor update to see if your problems eva

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60-cvs problem with dial-up RBLs?

gerians...). The conditions for the SA rule are getting pretty darn long... multifaceted and multiconditional... For now I have set RCVD_IN_OSIRU_DIALUP to 0 to minimize the consequences of this situation. Thoughts? -Dale --- This SF.ne

[SAtalk] SA and razor not playing nice

check[1685]: [ 8] razor-check finished successfully. I have already re-installed both razor and SA a couple different times, with no luck. Anyone have a solution? Thanks, Dale --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET si

[SAtalk] using sa-learn with spamc

opulate my Bayesian database? Below is what I do with procmail to use spamc... should I be doing something more? :0fw | spamc :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes spam Dale --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on

Re: [SAtalk] Another spamd failure to add to yesterday's slew

is down, it isn't smart enough to try another not so close. But continues to loop endlessly. No, I don't have a patch for it, I'm just passing on another's analysis. If you remove the offending script then things work okay. Something like rpm -e perl-Razor will work, apparen

[SAtalk] Missing spamass.sock

d sendmail daemon it says they both start OK but the spammilter hasn't started. When I look at the system logs, it shows that sendmail was unable to find /var/run/spammilter/spamass.sock. Do I have to create this file manually? If so how? Ian Dale MIS Manager Com10 International Pty. Ltd.

[SAtalk] Certain Spams bypassing Filtering?

Hi, I have a set of 5 emails in my inbox, all from a [EMAIL PROTECTED] address, and all bypassing my filtering. The largest is 2.6k, so it didn't get excluded by my procmail recipe or by spamd. spamd/spamc version is 2.43 (but I have seen it happen with 2.31 also). I am at a loss to begin where

Re: [SAdev] Repost from [SAtalk] Re: False Tagging

; spam, defanged, then sometime later being run through SA a second > time, and > not scoring as high because the mime has been defanged. It would > appear > that the second SA run is clobbering the headers added by the first > one. > > > > At 10:30 AM 7/16/2002 -0700

[SAtalk] False Tagging?

pe: text/html X-Spam-Prev-Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=INVALID_MSGID,SUBJ_HAS_Q_MARK version=2.31 X-Spam-Level: ** ++ Thanks, have a nice day. -Dale __ Do