[SAtalk] SA Libmilter patch + help request

2003-06-18 Thread Corwin Grey
Ok, I have done everything withing my power to figure this out. I got one thing fixed so that the libmilter lowercases the username prior to passing it to spamd which fixed one problem. The patch is listed below. (I know, my C sucks but it works... :) The other issue appears to be beyond my C++

Re: [SAtalk] Which user is running spamd - is this okay?

2002-05-23 Thread Corwin Grey
n the exim FAQ (http://www.exim.org/FAQ.html#TOC65) I'm guessing that exim is still running as root at the time it calls spamc (i.e. it hasn't gone into it's 'local delivery' mode yet). Can you configure Exim to call the spamc later in the delivery process? -- Corw

Re: [SAtalk] Which user is running spamd - is this okay?

2002-05-23 Thread Corwin Grey
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 05:26:26PM +0100, John Horne wrote: > On 23-May-2002 at 15:38:32 Corwin Grey wrote: > No, we run spamc from the Exim MTA, however I think your statements are > still applicable in as much as the MTA will run as root. I'm not very familiar with Exim. Does Ex

Re: [SAtalk] Apologies for absence/slowness this week

2002-05-23 Thread Corwin Grey
nths ago and I don't think I was able to focus on a project at all for about a month beforehand (and afterwards). -- Corwin Grey, MCP Application Development Network Engineering Network Operations Services http://www.techtell.com

Re: [SAtalk] Which user is running spamd - is this okay?

2002-05-23 Thread Corwin Grey
nt). The log message is actually a result of the global procmail running as root. The DROPPRIVS=yes will force it to run as the user that will be receiving the local delivery of the message. -- Corwin Grey, MCP Application Development Network Engineering Networ