On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:18:27AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Colm MacC?rthaigh wrote:
> > This won't cover everything though, I posted to bugtraq twice on
> > saturday and ever since I've had a constant stream of vacation
> > messages and mail bounces. It seems a a lot of MTA installations
> > out
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:03:18PM -0500, Johnny L. Wales wrote:
> Anyhoo, I wrote a little perl script that takes the name of a user and
> automagically installs SpamAssassin for them. It's not quite ready for
> primetime, but I thought I'd send in what I had and maybe get some
> comments on it.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 01:06:06PM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On 20 Feb 2002, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>
> > The biggest problem with razor at present is the lack of vetting of
> > input, and some form of input validation is essential if razor is to be
> > more than a curiosity - for example
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:28:41PM -0500, B. Cook wrote:
> How would I go about this, I'm running spamd / spamc and using a global procmailrc
>on FreeBSD -stable.
send it to /dev/null, modify the trap rule to something like:
:0:
* ^Subject:.*\*\*\*\*SPAM\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
--
[E
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:15:43PM -0500, Cayce Will wrote:
> Every so often one or more children of the spamd -d daemon don't die
> and they start to gobble up all the CPU on my E250 running Solaris
> 2.6. Eventually I have to kill them manually (i'm not sure if they
> die by themselves if I
