Re: [SAtalk] LDAP Storage instead of SQL Storage

2003-06-18 Thread Colin Dean
I agree with Kristian that LDAP and SQL are very different beasts. Having lived with both, I tend to work on the basis that LDAP can be a fast and lightweight engine for high load read access and that talking to it through an SQL layer could have performance implications. On the other hand, using

Re: [SAtalk] LDAP Storage instead of SQL Storage

2003-06-17 Thread Colin Dean
Kristian Koehntopp wrote on 11 June 2003: > Has anybody written a ConfSourceLDAP.pm analogue to ConfSourceSQL.pm? > I am looking for a solution that stores SpamAssassin Preferences within > an LDAP store. and on 17 June 2003: > This is an untested draft, which I am going to debug and test now. >

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

2003-06-16 Thread Colin Dean
John Lederer wrote: > I am extremely interested. > > We use Rolodap, an LDAP contacts directory . Automatically whielisting > email from anyone in tht would let us lower the threshold for spam > generally. > > If you can post your code somewhere where I could link to it, I would > make sure that

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

2003-06-14 Thread Colin Dean
Tony Earnshaw wrote: I suppose it might be of interest to others if you told the list what users your ldap director[y|ies] contain(s). As well as your policy. Like I don't want mail from my local users (100% Openldap 2.1.19 based) scanned, so both with my Postfix 2.0.x and SA-Exim 4.20/3.0 MTAs

[SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

2003-06-14 Thread Colin Dean
Hi, Using SpamAssassin, I want to whitelist every email address in the LDAP directory address book our mail clients (Mozilla and Netscape) use, without having a separate "whitelist_from" hard-wired into the SpamAssassin config file. So I've hacked some changes to SpamAssassin 2.55 so it can query