[SAtalk] Test hit results report or log

2003-12-16 Thread Chris A
Is there a way to get a report or log of the test results hits that spamassasin finds. The idea is I want to better fine tune the values assigned to cretin tests. However it is hard to narrow down just which test are getting hits. Right now I have to look at each of the emails SA headers and try to

Re: [SAtalk] What happened? hits 5.6 but not spam?

2002-10-17 Thread Chris A. Kalin
;ll take action (so their web site says). Chris Kalin - Original Message - From: "Mike Schrauder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Chris A. Kalin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:21 AM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] What hap

Re: [SAtalk] What happened? hits 5.6 but not spam?

2002-10-17 Thread Chris A. Kalin
Look closely. It's "-5.6", that's negative 5.6. :) Chris Kalin - Original Message - From: "Mike Schrauder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: [SAtalk] What happened? hits 5.6 but not spam? Updraded to 2.43 yesterday on a debi

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spamd 2.42 Problems

2002-10-14 Thread Chris A. Kalin
I've been mentioning this problem off and on to the mailing list since 2.41. With 2.41, SA would eventually crash if the "-m" option was used, and now with 2.42, it will occasionally crash whether or not "-m" is used. I've got SA running under daemontools' supervise so if it does go away, it come

Re: [SAtalk] "Bonded sender" joke :-/

2002-10-09 Thread Chris A. Kalin
If you report the spam to Bonded Sender, after enough complaints they will supposedly revoke the bond of the offender and they won't be in the list anymore. Chris Kalin Netwurx, Inc. - Original Message - From: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "SpamAssassin-Talk ML" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spamd 2.42 Problems

2002-10-09 Thread Chris A. Kalin
Like I reported before , this happened in 2.41 with Perl 5.6. And running in debug didn't give any hints either. If I don't use the -m switch, the problem will never occur. I upgraded to 2.42 and continued to not use the -m switch, and I haven't had a crash once. Chris Kalin Netwurx, Inc. ---

Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI -- not checked beckause the text is in German!

2002-10-03 Thread Chris A. Kalin
Actually, that looks more like Dutch. "Donderdag" is not German for Thursday - that word would be "Donnerstag". Chris Kalin - Original Message - From: "Simon Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:55 AM Subject: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI -- n

[SAtalk] 2.41 crashing?

2002-09-30 Thread Chris A. Kalin
Strangely enough, if I set the -m flag, SA 2.41 will run for a few hours, but then mysteriously crash with no error messages in the logs. If I run it without the -m flag, it'll work for days on end. This is Perl 5.6.1, on Linux 2.4.19. On another system with Perl 5.6.1, with kernel 2.4.9, I don