Re: [SAtalk] Low score for so many hits?

> *sigh* > HABEAS_SWE > > Do people read this list or just post questions? Sorry, not meant to lash > out, but this Habeas topic has been all the rage today. Don't know how > anyone could miss it. Wow, way to be rude about it. There might exist the possibility that not every subscriber of this

[SAtalk] Low score for so many hits?

Any idea how a message with so many hits got such a low score? X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on anubis X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,BIZ_TLD,CLICK_BELOW, HABEAS_SWE,HTML_50_60,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAG

[SAtalk] Re: procmail and stale spamassassin.lock

Just wanted to let everyone know, my bayes journal sync problems went away with SA 2.61 I'm using bayes_learn_to_journal 1 and bayes_journal_max_size 0, then running an sa-learn --rebuild twice a day. That seems to be working very well for me. On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:12:31PM -0800,

Re: [SAtalk] lock failed: little help PLEASE

Can someone explain to me what this debug log entry means: debug: bayes: something fishy, calculating atime (first pass) I get it every time I run sa-learn --force-expire Is that normal? --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giv

Re: [SAtalk] Remember to score RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK 0

If I recall the annoucement details correctly, the IP is still going to resolve for a little while (few months?), but will not return any results. Unlike Osirusoft's wildcard positive behavior, I don't see Dynablock's shutdown having any immediate negative consquences. Am I mistaken? On Wed, Nov

Re: [SAtalk] bayes_auto_learn 0 doesn't work?

And again this morning: [EMAIL PROTECTED] chip]$ ls -la .spamassassin/ total 30048 drwx--3 chip chip 4096 Nov 26 09:33 . drwxr-xr-x 13 chip chip 4096 Nov 26 09:44 .. -rw---1 chip chip 13 Nov 26 09:33 bayes.lock -rw---1 chip chip

Re: [SAtalk] bayes_auto_learn 0 doesn't work?

> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 09:32:15PM -0800, Chip Paswater wrote: > > I have bayes_auto_learn turned off in .spamassassin/user_prefs: > > ok. > > > I see bayes_journal getting some action: > > the journal, by default, records atime updates for tokens when scannin

[SAtalk] bayes_auto_learn 0 doesn't work?

I have bayes_auto_learn turned off in .spamassassin/user_prefs: bayes_auto_learn 0 So how come when I get this spam: >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 24 21:25:58 2003 Subject: hi Folder: /home/chip/mail/spam/spam.to-be-archived 5578 I see bayes_journal getting some action: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [SAtalk] bayes learning

So amavisd-new does use bayes, you just need to set the perms right? On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:22:09PM +, Casper Gasper wrote: > > >debug: bayes: no dbs present, cannot scan: > >/root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks > > Have you got the DB_File module installed? You need it for bayes. I > take

Re: [SAtalk] bayes.lock problem

I've had this problem randomly. Bayes tends to lock itself for some sort of DB operation, dies midway, and then dosen't clear the lock. I've disabled my bayes in the meantime until I move over to spamd or amavisd-new. On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 06:33:25AM -0500, MIKE YRABEDRA wrote: > > > I had t

Re: [SAtalk] Problem with Bayes

I'm still having this locking problem, so I've disabled bayes. I'll look to either moving to spamd/spamc or amavisd-new over the next couple of weeks to see if that resolves my lock contention problems. On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 03:51:49PM -0800, Chip Paswater wrote: > > >

Re: [SAtalk] Problem with Bayes

> >I'm having some trouble with Bayes. Occasionally, mail will stop flowing > >in my system. This is because my procmail spamassassin.lock file becomes > >stale. I've futher discovered that it's because the bayes DB gets locked > >and somehow dies midway during a rebuild. This causes my whole m

[SAtalk] Problem with Bayes

I'm having some trouble with Bayes. Occasionally, mail will stop flowing in my system. This is because my procmail spamassassin.lock file becomes stale. I've futher discovered that it's because the bayes DB gets locked and somehow dies midway during a rebuild. This causes my whole mail system

Re: [SAtalk] Razor and DCC

Razor does a lookup to the Razor server every time. Nothing is cached. I assume the same for DCC On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 03:48:51PM +1100, Zlatko Hristov wrote: > Hello, > > Does Razor and DCC do a direct lookup to same database on the internet > every time SA scans a message? Or its storing

Re: [SAtalk] Razor problems

This problem has caused me to stop using Spamassassin to do individual reporting, and instead strip the emails and use razor itself to send spam in batches. I've found this to decrease the errors substantially. Additionally, now that I send in batches every 5 minutes, if razor refuses the report,

[SAtalk] procmail and stale spamassassin.lock

Does anyone else have trouble with procmail not cleaning up spamassassin.lock when it's done? I see a series of these in the procmail log: procmail: Locking "spamassassin.lock" procmail: [2425] Mon Nov 17 14:06:56 2003 procmail: Locking "spamassassin.lock" procmail: [2425] Mon Nov 17 14:07:04 20

Re: [SAtalk] Razor does not work with spamd?

Have you gotten razor working by itself? On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:20:44PM -0500, MIKE YRABEDRA wrote: > on 11/13/03 4:49 PM, David B Funk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Other thing to try, run spamd with the '-D' flag to turn on > > debugging output. (But don't run it that way for too long u

Re: [SAtalk] CPU Usage while sa-learning?

Also, check vmstat or top instead of relying on your system load average. The load average is not necessarily indicitave of your actual system load. If you find it taking too many resources, try bumping it's nice level way down when you run it. On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:30:21PM +0100, Christophe

Re: [SAtalk] (semi)automatic Razor reporting options? anyone don e it like thi s before?

If you use Windows and Outlook, try Cloudmark's Spamnet product. It's the commercial version of razor, and feeds the same backend database. I think it's still free to use. http://www.cloudmark.com As far as looking up status, there's no official way to do it. You could create a unique message,

[SAtalk] I Spamassassin

Guys, Awesome product! I've been hiding my email address for years. Also, years ago I turned off my webmaster@ hostmaster@ and other email addresses because the spam level was getting insane. Not to mention my global @chipware.net which would catch everything else. Now with spamassassin, all

Re: [SAtalk] (semi)automatic Razor reporting options? anyone done it like thi s before?

> my problem is how would i deal with the FW: on the front of messages etc? > perhaps i should write a little script that munges the mailbox and removes > the FW: and the few extra lines in each message and the >'s that get > created. As far as razor goes, subject lines don't matter, so don't wo

[SAtalk] Newbie Questions

Hey Guys, I apologize if these questions are asked somewhere, but I did browse the FAQ and documentation and didn't see an answer. I have a good understanding of Razor v2, but I just started using SA. 1. When reporting spam via spamassassin -r, can I supply an mbox instead of a single message?