Re: [SAtalk] spamds that don't finish

. I've told my user to move his .spamassassin directory away and start up a new set of bayes databases. Perhaps this will alleviate the problem. Cheryl On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 07:21:51AM -0800, Cheryl L. Southard wrote: > Hi All, > > I've got two spamd processes that just won

Re: [SAtalk] spamds that don't finish

Hi All, On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:06:44PM -0800, Bob Amen wrote: > > Another idea, are you using Bayes, and if so do you not have > > bayes_learn_to_journal enabled? I tried turning "bayes_learn_to_yournal" on for that particular user and some of his spamd processes are still getting stuck. I r

Re: [SAtalk] spamds that don't finish

y > debug: bayes: no dbs present, cannot scan: > /Users/admin/.spamassassin/bayes_toks > debug: Score set 1 chosen. > debug: Initialising learner > debug: bayes: Not available for scanning, only 0 spam(s) in Bayes DB < 200 > debug: bayes: 12764 untie-ing > debug: bayes: 127

[SAtalk] spamds that don't finish

Hi All, I've got two spamd processes that just wont go away. They've been running for well over 11 hours and are taking up 100% of my cpu. I've run "truss " but it doesn't report anything. The same user, coincidentally, is the recipient of both e-mails, but this user doesn't have any special rul

Re: [SAtalk] spamds that don't finish

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:32:49PM -, Pete Henshall wrote: > Are there spamc processes accessing them?? No. My spamc processes time out after 600 seconds, so they've finished up hours ago after they delivered their e-mails. > - what is in that userpref file? There are only comments in this u

[SAtalk] spamd -m stable?

Hi All, When we were running spamd V2.43 on our Solaris 8 computer, we found that the '-m' flag made spamd very unstable. The program would crash frequently so that no spamd would be running and no filtering was done. Does anyone know if the "-m" flag is now more stable? We've since upgraded t

[SAtalk] running out of memory

HI All, Can anyone please offer me any suggestions on how I can stop spamd from hogging all the memory on my mail server and spiriling into memory-thrashing hell? We are running spamd 2.43 with perl-5.8.0 on our Solaris 2.8 mail server. Every so often, another process on our mail server takes up

Re: [SAtalk] Razor2 check is skipped

Hi All, On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 11:42:05PM -0700, Andrew Flury wrote: > Quoting "Cheryl L. Southard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I don't understand why it can't find "new" because I can see the "new" > > routine

[SAtalk] Razor2 check is skipped

Hi All, I'm running SpamAssassin 2.41 with razor-agents-2.14 razor-agents-sdk-2.03 on both a Solaris 2.8 computer, and a Linux RedHat 7.3 computer. We're using Perl V5.8.0. When I run both spamassassin and spamc/spamd, I get this error message then Razor2 checks get skipped: spamd[9594]: razor

Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs ignored

e is executed on >behalf of the recipient. > > > I hope that helps, and I also hope it's right! > > St- > > > | -Original Message- > | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > | Cheryl L. Southard

[SAtalk] user_prefs ignored

Hi All, I am running SpamAssassin 2.41 with procmail as my local delivery agent with sendmail. I use spamc/spamd so that it runs site-wide from /etc/procmailrc. spamd is run as root with the flags "-d -a -c", and spamc isn't run with any flags. When I was testing the program, I deployed spamc