[SAtalk] spamd/spamc port question

2002-02-12 Thread Cayce Will
Hello all, I noticed in my spamd logs that the port that spamd/c connect on is always incremented upward. Is this normal behavior? What happens when a port number is hard coded for spamd and spamc? Do they start to increment from there? I'd just like to know what is supposed to happen. I wa

[SAtalk] spamassassin test error

2002-01-23 Thread Cayce Will
I downloaded and installed 2.0. When I ran the spamassassin -t test I got a weird error: enterprise# ./spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt > spam.out Failed to run MISSING_HEADERS SpamAssassin test, skipping: (Can't locate object method "check_for_missing_headers" via package "Mail::SpamAssassi

[SAtalk] spamd still sucking up CPU time

2002-01-22 Thread Cayce Will
Even with the spamassassin.cf fix in place, spamd processes occasionally don't close and start to monopolize the CPU. I'm not sure if it is related but in the procmail log I'm seeing this: procmail: Timeout, terminating "spamc" procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data succeeded It sounds like sp

RE: [SAtalk] occassional CPU hogging

2002-01-16 Thread Cayce Will
At 5:28 PM -0500 1/15/02, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:15:43PM -0500, Cayce Will wrote: >> > Every so often one or more children of the spamd -d daemon >> don't die >> > and they start to gobble up all the CPU o

[SAtalk] occassional CPU hogging

2002-01-15 Thread Cayce Will
Every so often one or more children of the spamd -d daemon don't die and they start to gobble up all the CPU on my E250 running Solaris 2.6. Eventually I have to kill them manually (i'm not sure if they die by themselves if I just let them go, some have sat there over half an hour sucking up