Hi!
I'm no expert in regular expressions, but a bunch of the spam I've received
recently has a link like this:
http://www.takrr.com?rid=1097
What would a rule look like to match a pattern like (I've read a little
about matching, but not enough to get it working):
http://(anything).(com|net|org
Hi!
In most of the spam I receive at the moment there seems to be a link/text
like:
http://www.domain.com/rid?=1142
Everything is (of course) base64 encoded - The main issue is to detect the
.domain.[com|net|biz]/rid?[1-x digits] ... Is it possible to make a rule for
this ? I have only seen it
Hi,
> I'm predicting you are not running 2.60 of SA? Older versions don't catch
> the BASE64.
Fom a tagged message:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.4 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
DCC_CHECK,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_BASE64_TEXT,
MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_H
Hi,
Inspired by the BigEvil list I've created my own little file in in
/etc/mail/spamassassin like this;
rawbody SpamLinks_1
/\b(?:rxwarehouseusa\.com|rxmoreusa\.com|self-entertainment\.biz|herbal9\.bi
z|onlyzbestout.\biz|yunoz\.biz|naturalherbal\.biz)\b/i
describe SpamLinks_1Generated Sp
Hi!
Consider the following headers:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 323 invoked by uid 615); 9 Nov 2003 00:28:19 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by worf.andebakken.dk by uid 81 with
qmail-scanner-1.20
(clamscan: 20030806. uvscan: v4.1.60/v
Hi!
Trying to run "make test" on a 2.60 installation gives me these errors
(RedHat 8.0);
t/spamd_protocol_10.ok 1/10 Not found: symbolshit = GTUBE
# Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 385
Not found: response-11 = SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK
# Failed test 3 in t/SATest.pm at line 38
Hi!
Trying to run "make test" on a 2.60 installation gives me these errors
(RedHat 8.0);
t/spamd_protocol_10.ok 1/10 Not found: symbolshit = GTUBE
# Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 385
Not found: response-11 = SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK
# Failed test 3 in t/SATest.pm at line 38
Hi!
I'm not quite sure where to put this, that's why it is cross-posted to both
mailing-lists.
Anyway, I wonder whether a "sort-of" domain setup is possible with
qmail-scanner and SpamAssassin ? What I want to achieve, is that all mail
for a specific domain uses its own bayesian database - and m
Hi!
Okay, new style of sending spam - and since I'm no good at regular
Expressions, I hope someone can tell me how to filter stuff like this out
(didn't get caught by my SA 2.55):
[Mail Body Qoute on]
For the first time on the web, we are offering
V*l*A*G*R*A F*R*E*E!
Yes, check out this Lim
Hi!
One thing I really miss about SpamAssassin - and it is not quite covered in
the FAQ - is whether any tools exist to create statistics/graphs over the
processed mail, maybe the ability to split statistics up per
recipient-domain, so that it will be easy to get an overview of how much
spam is i
Hi!
Does anyone have an idea of the memory-usage from spamd ?? I'm running the
spamd daemon via daemontools, and have experienced "out of memory" errors in
the debuglog when spamc is called from qmail-scanner-queue. The spamd
daemon/service has been limited to 40MB so far, but I've raised it t
Hi!
I've set up SpamAssassin site-wide on my qmail system, invoking spamc from
the qmail-scanner-queue.pl script.
Anyway, when starting the spamd daemon, I get this in the maillog-file:
Aug 10 13:19:41 mail spamd[11377]: debug: bayes: no dbs present, cannot
scan: /tmp/spamassassin-11377/.spamas
Title: Protecting Americas Infrastructure:
Hi!
Hmm I wonder why the message below hasn't
been caught by my SpamAssassin - maybe tweaking of the score values i my setup
needs to be adjusted ?? Some might think the message isn't spam - but I do.
Comments regarding tweaking of scores and
13 matches
Mail list logo
