I think the hits= is a rounded number. So it may have been 4.92 for example.
>>> "Chris Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/30/04 11:42AM >>>
I'm confused. A spam message got through and had this in the header:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0
tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,
HTML_MESSA
Is this possibe?
Let's say [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Joe is in a
whitelist_from_rcvd. Would it be possible to auto add a whitelist_from_rcvd for Mary?
This way Mary will be trusted since Joe is already trusted to send emails.
This is different than AWL since this
On Monday 12 January 2004 10:32 am, Carl Chipman wrote:
> What do most people who write new SA rules set their threshold too? I had
> set it around 3.0 for our company, but the false positive rate was very
> high. I was looking at some of the big-evil stuff and noticed that many of
> the scores w
On Friday 09 January 2004 02:03 pm, Justin Mason wrote:
> I think so -- whitelist_from_rcvd is checking only untrusted headers, and
> not looking at the trusted ones, which is incorrect. could you open a
> bugzilla entry for this?
Yep. I created this bug.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.
On Friday 09 January 2004 11:37 am, Brett Simpson wrote:
> Here's what I have in my user_prefs...
> trusted_networks 207.156.7.
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ns2b.hillsboroughcounty.org
I found that if I set the trusted_networks to something other network so that
sp
For the below message I'm trying to whitelist_from_rcvd so it's always ok but it's
doesn't appear to be working.
Here's what I have in my user_prefs...
trusted_networks 207.156.7.
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns2b.hillsboroughcounty.org
spamassassin -D < zstmsg > out 2>&1;grep trust out
