[SAtalk] Re: Re: Problem with expirying bayes db

2003-10-19 Thread Bernd Kuhls
On So 19 Okt 2003 05:35:45p Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 10:23:39PM +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote: >> The only solution I see is to delete the Bayes database and start >> from scratch:-( > > the real solution is to let more tokens get learned, and then

[SAtalk] Re: Problem with expirying bayes db

2003-10-18 Thread Bernd Kuhls
On Sa 18 Okt 2003 02:21:34p Soeren Gerlach wrote: > debug: bayes: something fishy, calculating atime (first pass) > debug: bayes: couldn't find a good delta atime, need more token > difference, skipping expire. Hi, I am having exactly the same problems here since some time. I also upgraded from

[SAtalk] Bayes expire in SA 2.60

2003-10-13 Thread Bernd Kuhls
Hi, I am using SA 2.60, updated vom 2.55 some weeks ago. I was also using various rc-versions of 2.60. In local.cf I have no values assigned to the use of the Bayes-db so I am running on default values. When I try to clean up the Bayes db I get this: router:/disk/log # sa-learn -D --force-exp

[SAtalk] Re: spam test

2003-10-04 Thread Bernd Kuhls
On Do 02 Okt 2003 10:46:13p Eduardo Gargiulo wrote: > How could I test my setup? Hi, http://www.spamassassin.org/gtube/ Cheers, Bernd --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

[SAtalk] Re: Capital letters onli in the test score?

2003-09-27 Thread Bernd Kuhls
Hi, On Do 25 Sep 2003 01:18:45p Jan Erik Skogsholm wrote: > I have putthis string into may file what string? > /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and the test work only for captal > letters. Lower case lettesr do not work. Try using your string with "/i" at the end, this make it case-insensiti

[SAtalk] Re: Can´t learn spam mails with sa-learn

2003-09-25 Thread Bernd Kuhls
On So 14 Sep 2003 02:34:11a Bernd Kuhls wrote: > for this mbox-file: > The command I used is: sa-learn --spam --showdots -D --mbox ./Spam Hi, oops, sorry, this file is a mbx-file. Are there chances using sa-learn with those type of file? Greetings,

[SAtalk] Re: razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor

2003-09-24 Thread Bernd Kuhls
On Mi 24 Sep 2003 09:00:17p Dan Wilder wrote: > razor2 check skipped: Hi, did you apply the Razor patches contained in SA 2.60? Greetings, Bernd --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/s

[SAtalk] Re: Anyone using DCCifd?

2003-09-24 Thread Bernd Kuhls
On Mi 24 Sep 2003 06:21:34p Ed Kasky wrote: > >debug: DCCifd is not available: no r/w dccifd socket found. Hi, I got this, too despite a running dccifd: Sep 24 16:03:23 router dccifd[861]: 1.2.7 listening to /etc/apache/mail/dcc/dccifd srw-rw-rw- 1 root root0 Sep 24 20:04 dc

Re: [SAtalk] Can´t learn spam mails with s a-learn

2003-09-14 Thread Bernd Kuhls
Hi, On So 14 Sep 2003 06:26:53a Robert Menschel wrote: > These are completely random names, emails which are not published > on any web site, and have not been used to post to Usenet or such? yes. > That would imply to me that these messages all have the same > message id. Can you confirm wheth

[SAtalk] Can´t learn spam mails with sa-learn

2003-09-13 Thread Bernd Kuhls
Hello, since I am not the only having this problem according to some other newsgroup I would like to ask why the Bayes filter does not help. Ok, the long story: Since yesterday I am bombarded with spam. Those mails look like bounces of mails I sent, but I didn´t. As To: adress is some random n

[SAtalk] Re: System goes down

2003-09-02 Thread Bernd Kuhls
On Di 02 Sep 2003 06:06:00p Carlo Wood wrote: > I thought that there should only ONE spamd be running? Hi, only if you start spamd with -m 1 Greetings, Bernd --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://th

[SAtalk] Spam got score -80.6 - Spamassassin 2.55

2003-06-22 Thread Bernd Kuhls
Hi, got this nice baby: Greetings, Bernd --cut Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from router ([192.168.1.8]) by router with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19UD83-0006oj-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 00:16:07 +0200 Received: from localhost by local