Re: [SAtalk] strange behavior of Bayesian analyzer in SA 2.6

2003-10-21 Thread Ben Wing
imeOLE' => 0.123452938769744 debug: bayes token 'HX-MimeOLE:Microsoft' => 0.132269298472378 debug: bayes token 'HX-MimeOLE:Produced' => 0.13317079507 debug: bayes: score = 3.84778018769349e-06 debug: using "/usr/home/wing/.spamassassin" for user

Re: [SAtalk] strange behavior of Bayesian analyzer in SA 2.6

2003-10-21 Thread Ben Wing
.net with QMQP; 17 Oct 2003 06:40:41 - Received: from ddslppp71.tcsn.uswest.net (HELO neee) (216.161.150.71) by mpls-pop-02.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 17 Oct 2003 07:23:42 - Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 00:28:01 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Ben Wing" <[EMA

[SAtalk] correction: re strange behavior of Bayesian analyzer in SA 2.6

2003-10-18 Thread Ben Wing
the test message that got flagged by the Bayesian analyzer as 100% spam actually had a bit more than just "test" in the body since i sent it from a yahoo account: -- test. --

[SAtalk] strange behavior of Bayesian analyzer in SA 2.6

2003-10-18 Thread Ben Wing
hi. i just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.6 and i'm seeing something rather odd about the Bayesian results: nearly every one is almost exactly 0%, 50%, or 100%! it's almost as if it's applying an extreme rounding function to the actual result. now, these are turning out so far to be accurate, but i'm st