[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]On Sat, Jan 24,
2004 at 10:49:37AM +0400, Dr Aldo Medina
carved this out of pure phosphors:
> Is there any way to protecto form this?. I just received this email:
>
> TThe coomputeer mmust haave the 'suspend too RRAAM' feeatt
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:50:58PM +0100, pacho baratta
carved this out of pure phosphors:
>
Uhm, see you around, i guess?
--
panic("Detected a card I can't drive - whoops\n");
2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/daynaport.c
---
The S
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 08:03:59AM +0100, John Wilcock
carved this out of pure phosphors:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:35:30 -0700, Anthony Martinez wrote:
> > In the spam that has deliberate bayes-busters (three lines of random words), the
> > X-Mailer header is totally bogus, like
In the spam that has deliberate bayes-busters (three lines of random words), the
X-Mailer header is totally bogus, like this
X-Mailer: cyan exiting space
header XMAILERBOGUS X-Mailer =~ /^[^A-Z0-9]*$/
describe XMAILERBOGUS X-Mailer header has NO uppercase letters, NO
numbe
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 11:00:14PM -0800, schafer
carved this out of pure phosphors:
> To Spamassassin:
>
> My publication is double-opted in by 15,000 families with children with
> autism. We are routinely victimized by incompetent software like
> spamassassin because of false positives. This
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 10:50:18AM -0500, Fred
carved this out of pure phosphors:
>
> Something about this causes it to hit on every message which does not
> contain a X-Originating-IP header. I think you need a meta test to check if
> that tag exists before checking if it *doesn't* contain that
I got a spam today where the X-Originating-IP header wasn't a number. Hotmail
always puts the dotted quad in the header.
I wrote a rule to match this - I hope it's useful.
header XORIG_IP_NOT_NUMBER X-Originating-IP !~ /\[[\d\.]*]/
describe XORIG_IP_NOT_NUMBERThe X-Originating-IP header
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:19:21PM -0700, Anthony Martinez
carved this out of pure phosphors:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:13:46PM -0800, George
> carved this out of pure phosphors:
> > Hello list!
> >
> > Can someone show me a rule for detecting an empty subject line?
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:13:46PM -0800, George
carved this out of pure phosphors:
> Hello list!
>
> Can someone show me a rule for detecting an empty subject line?
>
> I've "searched and tried" just about everythign under the sun.
header EMPTYSUBJECT Subject =~ ^$
describe EMPTYSUBJECT Empty
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:00:52AM -0500, Christopher X. Candreva
carved this out of pure phosphors:
>
> And, anyone know what the x-stuff-for-pete I often see in spam is from ?
Eudora adds that to HTML mail for reasons known only to Pete.
>
>
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 02:39:18PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter
carved this out of pure phosphors:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:26:59PM -0600, Anthony Martinez wrote:
> > I think, last time I saw this discussed, you needed to add
> > spamd 783/tcp
>
> No you
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:24:21AM -0700, Catherine Pinatiello
carved this out of pure phosphors:
> I installed spamassassin on a cobalt Raq3. (Yeah I can hear the groans
> already.) So on starting spamd using the script in rc.d it gives this
> message:
>
> Starting spamd: spamdCould not creat
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:51:46AM -0700, Rum Jungle
carved this out of pure phosphors:
> Hi,
>
> How can I get spamd running on red hat 9 using
> xinetd.d?
That would totally defeat the POINT of a daemon. Spamd runs by itself and
listens on port 783 for a spamc connection.
Pi
>
> Also I am h
13 matches
Mail list logo
