[SAtalk] MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT problem

Hi, I just received an email from a friend that was marked as spam - though it isn't spam. (I'm using spamassassin 2.61). here are the headers: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="=_NextPart_000_0075_01C3C7D9.80663B40" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.55

[SAtalk] how to get a decent postfix spamassassin setup?

Hi, I've been playing with amavisd-new and spamassassin the last days. but it seems as amavisd-new cuts down the features spamassassin brings along. Also the sql settings feature doesn't seem to work that well. So I'm curious and would like to know how you guys have setup up postfix to work along

[SAtalk] SA eating up my headers

I have some strange problem. whenever I run the sendmail command from an php script and have spamassassin activated my email headers get changed to something like this: snip Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by mail.server.com with SpamAssassin (2.60 1.212-2003-09-23-exp); Sun,

[SAtalk] microsoft worm - working solution

I found a posting in some newsgroup and modified the rules a bit. they work for me very nice. here you go: header MDS_Swen_A_0From=~ /(email|inet|internet|mail|microsoft|ms|net|network)/i header MDS_Swen_A_1From=~ /(section|service|system)/i header MDS_Sw

[SAtalk] microsoft worm - working solution

I found a posting in some newsgroup and modified the rules a bit. they work for me very nice. here you go: header MDS_Swen_A_0From=~ /(email|inet|internet|mail|microsoft|ms|net|network)/i header MDS_Swen_A_1From=~ /(section|service|system)/i header MDS_Sw

Re: [SAtalk] Rule for MS Security Alert

Hi, > I was just fiddling around and I entered a rule to catch some of the text in > the MS Security Alert patch but it never seems to go over the threshold. this is my ruleset. rawbody SWEN_FNAMES /(Patch516.exe|Q683158.exe|Q224439.exe)/ describeSWEN_FNAMES

Re: [SAtalk] Rule for MS Security Alert

Hi, > I know I should be using an anti-virus, but it should still work, no? > > Well, here's my rule. It looks simple enough to me: > > body IAW_GENERAL19_RULE /latest version of security/i > score IAW_GENERAL19_RULE 20.0 > describe IAW_GENERAL19_RULE This is the GENERAL 19 Rule > > I bump

[SAtalk] SA 2.60rc3 reporting spam fails

I just wanted to report some spam. I keep getting this: "SpamAssassin: no Internet hashing methods available, so couldn't report." what does this mean? thanks, Andreas --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. h

Re: [SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin 2.60 rc3 - lots of misses by SA

On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:43, Malte S. Stretz wrote: > On Friday 29 August 2003 16:22 CET Andreas Kotowicz wrote: > > lots of mails don't get tagged by spamassassin rc3. I just updated from > > 2.55 to 2.60 rc3 and those messages attached to this mail went through > >

[SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc3 - lots of misses by SA

lots of mails don't get tagged by spamassassin rc3. I just updated from 2.55 to 2.60 rc3 and those messages attached to this mail went through without being marked. no single trace of spamassassin! I have perl 5.005_03 installed. thanks, andreas --- Begin Message ---

[SAtalk] enable/disable spamassassin via sql check

Hi, I want to setup up spamassassin for virtual users who don't have a home directory. that's why a /etc/procmailrc file should point to each users spamassassin setting. I want to give the user the opportunity to disable and enable spamassassin if they want to. so is there a variable I could put