Setting the score TRACKER_ID 0 improved the performance significantly.
Tested it while getting attacked by spammers and the spamd processes were
under control.
Thank you for your help.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Administ
We have 512 MB of RAM, 2.5 GB Swap running Solaris 8 x86. It should be
plenty. I will try spamd on a separate server if I can't figure anything
out.
Thank you for the input.
-ed
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Puhek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Administratio
Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Administration Dept." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spamd load problem
> Hmm, There's a lot of useful info mis
Hello,
We are running SpamAssassin server wide via procmail and sendmail through
/etc/procmailrc . We are having a serious load problem even using the
spamc/spamd. The spamd processes completely hog the CPU to the point
sendmail panics and reports load problems in the syslog.
Below is the load
