Hey guys -
Over the weekend I set up a "mailgate" box, following the
directions I found at
http://www.advosys.ca/papers/printable/postfix-filtering.html and so far,
everything is working ok. I'd like to know if there's a way to get the
"filter.sh" script they call for to use spamd instead o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
I am new using Kmail&Spamassassin&Razor and I have two very basical questions:
1- When I run "razor-admin -register" or "razor-admin -crrate" I get the
following error: "nextserver: discover0: No Razor Discovery servers available
at this t
Ok,
so i'm running SA 2.50 (no bayes yet) site-wide as a gateway to my exchange
server at the office here and it looks like a spam i received triggered my
whitelist by adding:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to the headers. I want to have users in my domain on the whitel
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 10:16:00AM -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> Theo remarked in another thread that Bayes is most accurate when the DB
> nspam is approximately equal to nham.
That's not what I said. I said that you can't be necessarily surprised
if spam is classified as ham if your training set
anyone?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Hutchings
> Sent: 29 March 2003 18:10
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: [SAtalk] Report points vs. header
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 12:42:26PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:52:47AM -0500, Chris Devers wrote:
> > debug: bayes corpus size: nspam = 1289, nham = 29058
>
> wow, that's way a lot of ham.
I was curious so I just checked mine:
0.0000 7490